- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:09:43 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 25/06/12 22:02, Paul Gearon wrote: > Forwarded to the main mailing list (thanks for pointing this out Andy). > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Let's work on these topics in this week's call: >> >> * Approve new MINUS tests (are these now in CVS?) > > Yes. Marked as: > :full-minuend dawgt:approval dawgt:NotClassified . > :partial-minuend dawgt:approval dawgt:NotClassified . ARQ passes these tests (because it's Paul's implementation!) >> * Approve new syntax tests I disagree with: syntax-BINDscope7.rq syntax-BINDscope8.rq They should be positive tests as there is a join so the "no redefine variable" does not apply. (and the spec isn't finished in this area) >> * Clarify SERVICE SILENT behavior >> * Format of protocol error bodies (proposal is no change to specification) >> * Document / Tests / To PR review >> >> >> talk to you all tomorrow, > > Paul >
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 07:10:21 UTC