Re: 3 further syntax tests proposed for variable scoping

sorry for that...

 now with corrected URLs (all three test cases are in the respective manifest):

>> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope2.rq
>> Positive:  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope3.rq



Axel

-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: AxelPolleres



On 19 Jun 2012, at 16:12, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> Axel,
> 
> You have the same URL for all three tests. Care to try again? :)
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> On 6/12/2012 6:17 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
>> I added some test cases on scoping for BIND a while ago... I'd suggest some more on scoping in connection with sub-selects:
>> 
>> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> Positive:  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> 
>> best,
>> Axel
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 09:21:50 UTC