Re: Possible Service Description change

On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> In a single update request there may be operations that use USING/USING NAMED and some that do not.  So one operation may use USING/USING NAMED to get a dynamically constructed dataset and the next operation does not use USING* so it can see the results of an earlier operation.

Interesting. I hadn't considered that. This is where we run up against the few SD "features" being under specified, I guess. So do you think the current wording is acceptable?

thanks,
.greg

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 14:50:10 UTC