- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:50:57 -0400
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On May 22, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Steve Harris wrote: > I've only read 10.2, but it seems good to me. > > The only thing I wonder about is if UNDEF would be better as UNBOUND, to match BOUND(). It's more characters, but might be more consistent? I thought the same thing, but am getting more and more reluctant to change things that we've had around for a long time… .greg
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 13:51:50 UTC