- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:11:48 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
The XSD 1.1 specs are have finally achieved REC status! http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/ There appears to have been some late work on xsd:duration, which may have made it suitable for use in RDF and OWL. The RDF WG is poised to add xsd:duration to the recommended/permitted/approved (whatever) list of XSD datatypes for RDF. Could the OWL WG provide *advisory* input as to whether this is a bad idea? Ideally, if RDF adds xsd:duration, OWL should as well, so it would be good if the OWL WG could determine whether the current definition of xsd:duration will be "added" to OWL. If RIF and SPARQL WGs are active, they may also want to take a look at xsd:duration. peter
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 21:13:51 UTC