- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 08:57:21 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 01/05/12 08:48, Polleres, Axel wrote: > In order to close off the comments section upto Feb2012, cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments#Last_Call_.28to_Feb_2012.29 > I have drafted a response to JP-5, cf. > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JP-5 I'm confused. LeeF: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Apr/0003.html Acknowledgement: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Apr/0014.html > In the course of this, I have added the suggested example to the test suite as > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/property-path/pp37.rq > which I'd kindly ask for approval/cross-checking (I haven't yet tested it with a running implementation, but it's the behaviour I assume valid with the new semantics of "*". > I've fixed the manifest (added a test name). ARQ passes this test. Andy > best, > Axel > > BTW: I found a use case http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/property-path/pp36.rq in that directory, which is not part of the manifest. > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 07:57:53 UTC