- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:59:26 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 25 Apr 2012, at 09:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
...
>
> Better: add BindingsClause to
>
> [58] GraphPatternNotTriples
> ::= GroupOrUnionGraphPattern | OptionalGraphPattern | MinusGraphPattern | GraphGraphPattern | ServiceGraphPattern | Filter | Bind | BindingsClause
>
>
> { ?s ?p ?o BINDINGS ?p ?o { (:p 157) (:q 34.7) }
>
> execution wise - happens after 'extend' (BIND) and before 'filter' (FILTER)
>
> then its in subqueries and everywhere else.
This also neatly solves the surprise FILTER interaction, as BINDINGS get joined before FILTER is run, when inline.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England NG80 1ZZ
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 08:59:53 UTC