RE: Today's Minutes / Publication Plan

I have a question on the discussion for BINDINGS:

Was the proposal of SA-3 to allow BINDINGS also within subselects 
considered?

If I understand it correctly, this would be implementable by
changing one grammar rule 
 [8]   SubSelect   ::=   SelectClause WhereClause SolutionModifier 
to 
 [8]   SubSelect   ::=   SelectClause WhereClause SolutionModifier BindingsClause


I actually like this, since it seems to be quite a clean and simple 
way to address the issue:

(i)   it makes BINDINGS available essentially anywhere
(ii)  it still keeping BINDINGS "in spirit" at query level
(iii) it would allow to address the comments
(iv)  it wouldn't cause any algebra changes, would it?

Thoughts?

Best,
Axel

 
-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres 
Siemens AG Österreich 
Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies 
CT T CEE 
 
Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 
Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2012 5:28 AM
> To: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: Today's Minutes / Publication Plan
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-24
> 
> Key point: we resolved to publish Overview (pending fixing 
> the small bits in the document, marked with '@@@', as 
> discussed in the meeting and recorded in the minutes).  I 
> volunteered to make those changes.
> 
> I'm hoping we can publish Overview, GSP, and CSV/TSV on May 1 
> (next Tuesday).
> 
> Does anyone see any problem with that plan?
> 
> Also, on the BINDINGS issue, we encouraged Andy to go deeper 
> into his plan of addressing the comments by making BINDINGS 
> work everywhere.
> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 08:12:00 UTC