- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:10:56 -0400
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 00:43 +0200, Polleres, Axel wrote: > Hi all, > > while I didn't do changes on the overview doc as of yet, I'd like to > highlight things that might need discussion before we can go to LC: > > 1) Reference to: > " > Using SPARQL1.1 with RDF1.1 - SPARQL1.1 is based on the Resource > Description Framework (RDF) specifications in their 2004 version. This > document describes how SPARQL1.1 is to be used with RDF1.1, which is > currently under development. (Note: this is a placeholder at the > moment.) > " > > * Will we progress this document to at least a note? Without having thought about this a lot, I suggest we have the Overview just link a web page (maybe http://www.w3.org/2012/sparql11-and-rdf11 or 2009/sparql/rdf11) and for now that can redirect to the wiki page, but later if we make it a WG Note, we can switch the redirect to be there. > 2) Reference in Section 11 > > Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language, ed. Dave Beckett and Tim > Berners-Lee, W3C Team Submission 28 March 2011. (See > http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/.) > > * Can we keep that and change it later on, as Turtle becomes a Rec > from the RDF WG? Since there's already a WD, let's use that. http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle That will update in place to the REC. Also, there's, "@@@Shall this document also link to the test suite?" My answer to that would be Yes, Absolutely, but it should be something a little more friendly than http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html Maybe we can make a short web page that talks about the test suite and then links there. I'm not sure whether to use a wiki or non wiki URL for that. I guess I'd pick non-wiki. Maybe 2009/sparql/test-suite. -- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 13:11:10 UTC