Re: 83% victory

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 20:19 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> 
> On 21/12/11 07:18, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > Great!
> >
> > One question concerning JSON results format: Do we consider skipping CR for JSON as well? If so, we haven't said so in the previous draft, so we might likewise re-publish at least with that note added?
> 
> Then we might as well publish a CR version?

True.   Also, I think that note is a courtesy not strictly required by
process.  I wouldn't worry about it, given it being in all the other
docs.

  -- Sandro

>  Andy
> 
> >
> > Axel
> >
> >
> > On 20 Dec 2011, at 18:13, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> >
> >> The WG resolved today to go to last call on Query, Entailment, Update,
> >> Service Description, and Protocol, publishing as soon as practical in
> >> January, with a 4 week comment period, and with text saying we might
> >> skip CR.   We didn't manage to finish up on Graphstore HTTP Protocol,
> >> before the end of the hour.
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone for all the amazingly hard work this group has been
> >> doing!   I hope everyone has a very pleasant break.  Next meeting in two
> >> weeks.
> >>
> >>      -- Sandro
> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 23:06:57 UTC