Re: SPARQL TC tomorrow "agenda" and regrets

I'm at risk for the call tomorrow, but in my opinion the parts of Query that I'm familiar with are ready to go.

- Steve

On 19 Dec 2011, at 15:39, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> we might have some chairing difficulty tomorrow, but hopefully Sandro can jump in. 
> The main agendum from my side is:
> 
> * Vote on (2nd) LC or CR publications on all docs on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/PostLastCall
> 
> As I can't be there to vote tomorrow: I am fine for publish for all docs, if the editors are.
> As for SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol, here is my *personal opinion*:  if not done so 
> already in today's taskforce call, issues should be resolved after Christmas and we may postpone 
> publication for this one doc, but should strive for publication of all others by Christmas.
> 
> * As for ACTION-569: when publishing we shouldn't forget to  have some template text (bold face?) that we might skip to PR with out CR 
> on drafts where the implementation requirements are already met. I herewidth suggest the following simple standard sentence 
> for all our LC publications in this round to be added in bold face or inside a box in the "Status Section":
> 
> "The SPARQL WG is considering publishing the next iteration of this document directly as Proposed Recommendation, if the implementation requirements 
> that normally have to be proven during Candidate Recommendation phase are already fulfilled, see http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html" 
> 
> Please discuss if possible, if this is sufficient, or whether this sentence needs adaption.
> 
> Thanks, all from my side  & best regards,
> Axel
> 
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 20:47:24 UTC