- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:56:40 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
>> This might be a corner case, but I think it's possible, and so should probably be mentioned (or "the use of aggregates in the projection" simply generalized by removing "in the projection"). > > Yes, but I can just add HAVING to the list of things that makes a query level implicitly aggregated, right? > > I've changed the text to: > > “If aggregates or HAVING are used in the query level, but the GROUP BY term is not used, then this is taken to be a single implicit group, to which all solutions belong.” And ORDER BY. I have the doc open I'll make the change (HAVING and ORDER BY are part of a query level so they don't need to be enumerated but I will put in text in the current style). Andy > > - Steve >
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 09:57:23 UTC