- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:12:19 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 09/12/11 11:24, Steve Harris wrote: > @@Andy > Do we have an ancestor type for bNodes/literals/URIs? Should I just omit the return type? We do, RDF does not :-) RDF term, or just "term" See e.g. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#func-sameTerm Andy
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 13:12:48 UTC