- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:12:27 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Gregory Williams" <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I see now... I guess I was just confused since as opposed to http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description there was no link to the RDF/XML or Turtle in the HTML version (hadn't checked with conneg ... and I see now it's even there in the RDFa)... so all is fine! thanks, Axel On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:47, Ivan Herman wrote: > Having looked at it... I do not understand. The type triple _is_ there, in all three formats (RDFa, turtle, and rdf/xml) > > Ivan > > On Dec 6, 2011, at 19:18 , Axel Polleres wrote: > > > Hi Ivan, Sandro, > > > > While reviewing SPARQL1.1 service description, I had the following remark: > > > >>> 13) 3.2.14 sd:resultFormat > >>> > >>> (non-critical) A side remark on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ... shouldn't e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON have at least an RDFa triple stating: > >>> > >>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON> a <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Format> . > >>> > >>> ? > >> > > Greg's answer: > > > >> Maybe? I don't have strong feelings about this, as the data is available via conneg in RDF/XML and Turtle. If you think RDFa is necessary, we can talk with Ivan about what it would take to add it. > > > > So, would it be possible/useful to add these type triples? > > > > cheers, > > Axel > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:13:00 UTC