Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (part 1 - up to end of section2) from Lee Feigenbaum on 2011-11-21 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2011)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:07:48 -0500
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4ECABDA4.1020602@thefigtrees.net>

Thanks, Andy.

I believe I've now fixed 2.2.3 & also other places in which 
default-graph-uri and named-graph-uri were erroneously used in reference 
to update operations.

Lee

On 11/18/2011 4:59 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 17/11/11 14:55, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>> ** Section 2.2.3
>>>
>>> What about "WITH"?
>>
>> Huh. This seems like old text to me. Didn't we also change the name of
>> these parameters? Damn. I'm going to need to revisit our past
>> discussions to see what happened to the proper text here.
>
> The text in the document does not reflect:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0223.html
>
> Andy
>

Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 21:08:30 UTC