- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:38:11 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'm quite convinced by Lee's argument around consistency, so prefer Option 2. - Steve On 2 Nov 2011, at 09:35, Andy Seaborne wrote: > I've implemented option 2 for now. If there is further support for option 3, we can do that as well as the document if in a better state for making changes. > > In doing the changes, and for general editting, I have cleaned up all the function prototypes, invented the term "string literal" to cover simple literal, plain literal with language string and xsd:string. "string literal" is used in quite a few places where we already had this situation (e.g. UCASE). > > There is text discussing the return type as being the same kind as the main argument acted up (which happens to be the first one). > > A lot of fixing up the XML because the original conversion from XHTML had broken the formatting. > > Please - could someone check 17.4 - I'm now at the point where I see what should be there, not what is there. > > I changed ARQ for the more liberal argument input and didn't get any test fails from the suite. > > Andy > > On 01/11/11 13:25, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> On 10/31/2011 10:26 AM, Steve Harris wrote: >>> On 2011-10-31, at 13:41, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>>> I've put in text for STRBEFORE, STRAFTER and REPLACE, removed SHA224, >>>> and done some tidying up in the area. >>>> >>>> See >>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#func-strings >>>> and onwards. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> One issue arises: >>>> >>>> REGEX currently takes a simple literal only for the first argument. >>>> >>>> For RDF 1.1 preparation, this should change to xsd:string or simple >>>> literal. >>>> >>>> >>>> REPLACE is like REGEX except it makes replacements. >>>> >>>> What should the first argument to REPLACE be? >>>> >>>> I'm assuming the pattern replacement and flags are still simple >>>> literals (or + xsd:strings for RDF 1.1). >>>> >>>> Like REGEX only working on plain strings. >>>> Or also process language tagged literals? >>>> (c.f. STRBEFORE and STRAFTER) >>>> >>>> I'd like REGEX and REPLACE to align. >>>> >>>> Proposal 1: >>>> REGEX and REPLACE work on strings (simple literal or xsd:string) only. >>>> >>>> Proposal 2: >>>> REGEX and REPLACE work on all string-like forms as first argument >>>> (includes literals with language tag). This adds first argument >>>> literal with language tag to REGEX. >>> >>> I prefer 2. >>> >>> There's even an option: >>> >>> Proposal 3: >>> REGEX and REPLACE work on all literal forms as first argument >>> (includes literals with language tags and typed literals). This adds >>> first argument literal with language tag or datatype to REGEX. >>> >>> Not sure if I prefer that to 2, but it is an option. >> >> I prefer option 2 or option 1. I understand the motivation for option 3, >> but in general we've shied away from that sort of automatic casting in >> SPARQL, and I believe we ought to continue that way. >> >> Lee >> >>> >>> - Steve >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2011 09:38:49 UTC