- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:23:14 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Both seem good to me. Lee On 11/1/2011 1:45 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JL-1 > and please note this has been raised as a feature request: > http://www.openrdf.org/issues/browse/SES-873 > > (unless someone wants to argue for a change to ORDER BY) > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-14 > > Given that RDF 1.1 will include skolemization, it does not seem a good > idea to add features to SPARQL. > > The only change would be to IRI(blank node) to return a skolem IRI > constant. But (1) timescales of the working group do not align and (2) > we do not know all stores can do this yet. > > Andy > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 23:23:58 UTC