CommentResponse:HS-1

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HS-1

in response to:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Oct/0016.html

I've drafted some initial material for a response but I would prefer it 
if someone else would take over.

The comment discusses three implementations and ARQ is getting the right 
answers so I am not the best person to respond on behalf of the working 
group.  (If no-one feels comfortable handling it, I wil follow through 
on it including an a suitable disclosure statement.)

 Andy

Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 11:57:58 UTC