- From: Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:03:03 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Axel, The new wording is fine with me. - Matt On 10/17/2011 2:00 PM, Axel Polleres wrote: > reworded that as follows, does that work for you? > > <p>Just like in the earlier SPARQL1.0 specification [<a href="#SPARQL10-Query">SPARQL-Query</a>] from 2008, complex queries may include union, optional query parts, and filters; new features like value aggregation, path expressions, nested queries, etc. have been added in SPARQL1.1. Apart from SELECT queries - which return variable bindings - SPARQL supports ASK queries - i.e. boolean "yes/no" queries - and CONSTRUCT queries - which allow to construct new RDF graphs from a query result; all the new query language features of SPARQL1.1 are likewise usable in ASK and CONSTRUCT queries. > </p>
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 18:03:46 UTC