Re: renaming Service Description properties

I agree with this change - makes it shorter and more consistent :)

Thanks,

nick.


On 11/10/2011 09:14, "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:

> Looks good to me.
> 
> - Steve
> 
> On 10 Oct 2011, at 19:29, Gregory Williams wrote:
> 
>> Based on David Booths' comment in DB-6 [1] (point 11), and since it seems we
>> may have a second round of last calls anyway, I'd like to rename some of the
>> properties in the service description vocabulary for the sake of consistency.
>> The issue here is that some of the properties relating to datasets and graphs
>> have "Description" in their name, while others don't:
>> 
>>  3.2.12 sd:defaultDatasetDescription
>>  3.2.13 sd:availableGraphDescriptions
>> 
>> versus:
>> 
>>  3.2.16 sd:defaultGraph
>>  3.2.17 sd:namedGraph
>>  3.2.19 sd:graph
>> 
>> I'd like to rename those first to:
>> 
>> sd:defaultDatasetDescription -> sd:defaultDataset
>> sd:availableGraphsDescriptions -> sd:availableGraphs
>> 
>> Does anybody have any comments to this change? Would anyone object?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> .greg
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0018
>> 


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
					

Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 14:08:38 UTC