- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 02:35:45 +0200
- To: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
just in case, the current doc is to be found here: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml Axel On 8 Oct 2011, at 02:34, Axel Polleres wrote: > Hi, > > I adoped the suggestion below for the changed example query now. > I also modified the example for the federated query to a working one. > > As far as I can tell, the only bigger open issue now is the order of the sections, > where I personally still kind of prefer to tell the "story" for the overview document > in the order I have now, but I guess we can discuss this in detail for the next > iteration and ideally get the document out for review now as soon as possible. > > This said, I'd consider the Overview Doc ready at least for FPWD, ie. this is the "go-ahead" > to trigger Matt's and Andy's review actions ACTION-540 & ACTION-541. > > best, > Axel > > On 5 Sep 2011, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> I'd like to suggest the following query for the query example in the >> document "SPARQL 1.1 Overview" >> >> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> >> SELECT ?name (COUNT(?friend) AS ?count) >> WHERE { >> ?person foaf:name ?name . >> foaf:knows ?friend . >> } GROUP BY ?person ?name >> >> This shows more of SPARQL 1.1. Query and does not use FROM. >> >> Andy >> >> >> On 16/08/11 08:49, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> FWIW, I have moved an initial version of the Overview doc to CVS, still needs some fixing (particularly the refernces aren't correct yet) ... >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml >>> >>> Axel >>> >>> On 7 Aug 2011, at 16:02, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> >>>> I have updated the Overview document... >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Overview-Document >>>> >>>> In principle, my intention was a run-through all parts of the spec by a running example. this should be there now, touching all our docs (hope I didn't forget anything ;-) ) I hope this is sufficient as an entry point to our specs and a bit more appealing than only a plain bullet list of specs. >>>> >>>> This is still on the wiki, since AFAIR there was some process to turn TR template documents into spec-ready html (sandro?) >>>> if not, I can convert it manually to xmlspec, but that's not the major concern. >>>> >>>> Comments welcome! If it's good to go, maybe we can publish it together with Fed query... >>>> >>>> >>>> Axel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2011 00:36:16 UTC