- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 02:35:45 +0200
- To: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
just in case, the current doc is to be found here: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml
Axel
On 8 Oct 2011, at 02:34, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I adoped the suggestion below for the changed example query now.
> I also modified the example for the federated query to a working one.
>
> As far as I can tell, the only bigger open issue now is the order of the sections,
> where I personally still kind of prefer to tell the "story" for the overview document
> in the order I have now, but I guess we can discuss this in detail for the next
> iteration and ideally get the document out for review now as soon as possible.
>
> This said, I'd consider the Overview Doc ready at least for FPWD, ie. this is the "go-ahead"
> to trigger Matt's and Andy's review actions ACTION-540 & ACTION-541.
>
> best,
> Axel
>
> On 5 Sep 2011, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> I'd like to suggest the following query for the query example in the
>> document "SPARQL 1.1 Overview"
>>
>> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
>> SELECT ?name (COUNT(?friend) AS ?count)
>> WHERE {
>> ?person foaf:name ?name .
>> foaf:knows ?friend .
>> } GROUP BY ?person ?name
>>
>> This shows more of SPARQL 1.1. Query and does not use FROM.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On 16/08/11 08:49, Axel Polleres wrote:
>>> FWIW, I have moved an initial version of the Overview doc to CVS, still needs some fixing (particularly the refernces aren't correct yet) ...
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml
>>>
>>> Axel
>>>
>>> On 7 Aug 2011, at 16:02, Axel Polleres wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have updated the Overview document...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Overview-Document
>>>>
>>>> In principle, my intention was a run-through all parts of the spec by a running example. this should be there now, touching all our docs (hope I didn't forget anything ;-) ) I hope this is sufficient as an entry point to our specs and a bit more appealing than only a plain bullet list of specs.
>>>>
>>>> This is still on the wiki, since AFAIR there was some process to turn TR template documents into spec-ready html (sandro?)
>>>> if not, I can convert it manually to xmlspec, but that's not the major concern.
>>>>
>>>> Comments welcome! If it's good to go, maybe we can publish it together with Fed query...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Axel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2011 00:36:16 UTC