- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:54:58 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
There's a response at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JB-6 To help paragraph 2 of my response, I'm planning to add some text to the query doc (probably near the start of 17.4 Operator and Function Definitions) along the lines of: “It should be notated that any function or operator that is specified to return an error under some conditions is a valid extension point. That is, any implementation my return a non-error value in these error cases, and still be compliant with this recommendation.” Any thoughts? - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 13:55:34 UTC