Thursday, 29 December 2011
Saturday, 24 December 2011
- Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft
- Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft
Thursday, 22 December 2011
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
- 83% victory
- Re: Followup Review of Graphstore HTTP Protocol, for LC
- Re: Followup Review of Graphstore HTTP Protocol, for LC
- Re: Followup Review of Graphstore HTTP Protocol, for LC
- Re: Proposed wording to clarify that POST behavior in GSHP is only for RDF graph content
- Re: DB-5 response
- Re: Proposed wording to clarify that POST behavior in GSHP is only for RDF graph content
- Re: DB-5 response
- At risk for TC Dec 20
- Re: Proposed wording to clarify that POST behavior in GSHP is only for RDF graph content
Monday, 19 December 2011
- Re: DB-5 response
- DB-5 response
- Proposed wording to clarify that POST behavior in GSHP is only for RDF graph content
- Re: SPARQL TC tomorrow "agenda" and regrets
- Re: SPARQL TC tomorrow "agenda" and regrets
- SPARQL TC tomorrow "agenda" and regrets
- Re: GET on a graph store URI / Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Re: GET on a graph store URI / Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Re: GET on a graph store URI / Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Followup Review of Graphstore HTTP Protocol, for LC
Sunday, 18 December 2011
Saturday, 17 December 2011
- Re: GET on a graph store URI / Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Re: GET on a graph store URI / Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Re: Reconsidering REST
Friday, 16 December 2011
Thursday, 15 December 2011
- Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query
- Re: Query Review Part 2
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV; JSON
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
- Re: ACTION-552: my review of entailment regimes
- Re: ACTION-552: my review of entailment regimes
- Graph Store HTTP Protocol Telecon: Monday the 19th at 10am ET
- Re: my open comments-response drafts, please approve in next telco
- Re: Question on syncing entailment regimes conditions between Query and Entailment docs
- Re: Query Review Part 2
- Re: my open comments-response drafts, please approve in next telco
- Re: Query Review Part 2
- Re: Query Review Part 2
- Comment AZ-1, second response
- Re: my open comments-response drafts, please approve in next telco
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Re: Poll: scheduling a telecon to discuss POSTing to graphs & other graph store protocol issues
- Re: Query Review Part 2
- my open comments-response drafts, please approve in next telco
- Re: Question on syncing entailment regimes conditions between Query and Entailment docs
- GET on a graph store URI / Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Re: Poll: scheduling a telecon to discuss POSTing to graphs & other graph store protocol issues
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
- Re: Review of Update Document (Re: ACTION-554)
- Poll: scheduling a telecon to discuss POSTing to graphs & other graph store protocol issues
- Query Review Part 2
- Re: Review of Update Document (Re: ACTION-554)
- Re: Today's telecon
- Re: Question on syncing entailment regimes conditions between Query and Entailment docs
- Re: please wait on Graphstore Protocol
- Re: Copyright of test materials
- Today's telecon
- Re: Copyright of test materials
- Re: please wait on Graphstore Protocol
Monday, 12 December 2011
- Copyright of test materials
- Re: please wait on Graphstore Protocol
- Re: please wait on Graphstore Protocol
- Re: please wait on Graphstore Protocol
- please wait on Graphstore Protocol
- Re: Telecon of Tuesday 13/Dec
- Re: Telecon of Tuesday 13/Dec
- Re: Telecon of Tuesday 13/Dec
- Telecon of Tuesday 13/Dec
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- response for DB-9 is ready for approval ...
- Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:BD-2 ready to send...
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:BD-2 ready to send...
Sunday, 11 December 2011
- Re: CommentResponse:RC-5 ready
- Question on syncing entailment regimes conditions between Query and Entailment docs
- ACTION-552: my review of entailment regimes
Friday, 9 December 2011
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Re: Aggregates
- Re: Aggregates
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Re: Aggregates
- Re: Aggregates
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
Thursday, 8 December 2011
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
- Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
- Re: Aggregates
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Re: Aggregates
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Re: Question on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
- Re: Question on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
- Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Re: Aggregates
- Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query
- Re: CommentResponse:RC-5 ready
- Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Re: Aggregates
- CommentResponse:RC-5 ready
- Re: ACTION: 551 - Review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description
- Re: ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
- ACTION: 551 - Review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description
- Re: ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
Tuesday, 6 December 2011
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Aggregates
- Re: ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
- Re: Question on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
- Question on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
- Graph store protocol editor's draft has incorporated comments
- Re: Service description editor's edition status?
- Service description editor's edition status?
- Re: ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
- Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
- Review of Update Document (Re: ACTION-554)
- Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Re: Review of Graph Store Protocol (action 564)
- Re: OWL Profile IRIs
- Re: Sandro's review of Graph Store HTTP Protocol
- Re: Review of Graph Store Protocol (action 564)
- Re: Review of Graph Store Protocol (action 564)
Monday, 5 December 2011
- Re: ACTION-554
- Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2011-12-06
- Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2011-12-06
- Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2011-12-06
- Agenda SPARQL TC 2011-12-06
- Re: draft response to TI-3
- Re: ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
- Re: draft response to TI-3
- Re: Comment response DB-11a
- Re: ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
Sunday, 4 December 2011
- Re: draft response to TI-3
- Re: Comment response DB-11a
- Re: draft response to TI-3
- Re: Comment Response for AM-1
- Re: Comment response DB-11a
- Re: Regrets for Tuesday
- ACTION-550: my SPARQL1.1 Service Description review
- Re: Escape sequences (SPARQL and Turtle)
- Re: Comment Response for AM-1
- Re: Comment Response HSt-1 (D-Entailment & xsd:hexBinary & xsd:base64Binary)
- Comment response DB-11a
- Comment Response for AM-1
- Re: Comment Response HSt-1 (D-Entailment & xsd:hexBinary & xsd:base64Binary)
- OWL Profile IRIs
Saturday, 3 December 2011
- Re: Comment Response HSt-1 (D-Entailment & xsd:hexBinary & xsd:base64Binary)
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- SPARQL 1.1 Query Review Part 1
- Regrets for Tuesday
- Comment Response HSt-1 (D-Entailment & xsd:hexBinary & xsd:base64Binary)
- Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
- Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query
Friday, 2 December 2011
Thursday, 1 December 2011
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
Wednesday, 30 November 2011
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: Escape sequences (SPARQL and Turtle)
- Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
- Re: Escape sequences (SPARQL and Turtle)
- Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Escape sequences (SPARQL and Turtle)
- Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
- xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
- Re: draft response to TI-3
- Protocol : section 2.2.3
- draft response to TI-3
- teleconf now
- Re: Regrets
- Regrets
- Re: Indirect Graph Identification
- Sandro's review of Graph Store HTTP Protocol
Monday, 28 November 2011
- Re: WITH <x> -> INSERT|DELETE... USING *NAMED* <x>
- Re: WITH <x> -> INSERT|DELETE... USING *NAMED* <x>
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- should vs must on status codes (in HTTP Protocol)
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
Sunday, 27 November 2011
Saturday, 26 November 2011
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: WITH <x> -> INSERT|DELETE... USING *NAMED* <x>
- Re: WITH <x> -> INSERT|DELETE... USING *NAMED* <x>
- Re: WITH <x> -> INSERT|DELETE... USING *NAMED* <x>
- Re: SPARQL Update grammar tweak: INSERT ... DATA
- WITH <x> -> INSERT|DELETE... USING *NAMED* <x>
- SPARQL Update grammar tweak: INSERT ... DATA
Friday, 25 November 2011
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Review of the Ent. Reg. Document by Markus
Thursday, 24 November 2011
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
Wednesday, 23 November 2011
- Re: Review of the Ent. Reg. Document by Markus
- Job Position: one Research Assistant in Semantic Web and Healthcare areas
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
Tuesday, 22 November 2011
- Re: Escape sequences (SPARQL and Turtle)
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- test cases overview page (ACTION-532)
- Urgent situation (late regrets)
- Re: Review of Update
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- RE: SPARQL WG Agenda for Tuesday, November 22
- SPARQL WG Agenda for Tuesday, November 22
Monday, 21 November 2011
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Review of the Ent. Reg. Document by Markus
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (part 1 - up to end of section2)
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol
- Re: Review of SPARQL Protocol
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol
- query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Aggregates in ORDER BY
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Review of Update
- Re: Review of Update
- Review of SPARQL Protocol
- Re: Review of Update
- Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol
Saturday, 19 November 2011
Friday, 18 November 2011
Thursday, 17 November 2011
- Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 Overview
- Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (part 1 - up to end of section2)
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (part 1 - up to end of section2)
- Re: Comment response for DB-14(cont)
- Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (part 1 - up to end of section2)
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Editor's draft of Graph Store Protocol ready for review
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Garlik review of Protocol
- Re: Review of Update
- Comment response for DB-14(cont)
- Re: Review of Update
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- SPARQL Protocol ready for review
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- minutes of 15 November
- Re: RDF 1.1 / rdf:langString (test change)
- Re: SPARQL TC 2011-11-15
- Re: RDF 1.1 / rdf:langString (test change)
- Re: Order of evaluation for aggregates
- RDF 1.1 / rdf:langString (test change)
- Re: Minor error in SPARQL Update 4.2.5
- Re: SPARQL WG open comments
- Re: SPARQL TC 2011-11-15
Monday, 14 November 2011
Thursday, 10 November 2011
- Re: Correction for SPARQL Query spec
- Order of evaluation for aggregates
- Correction for SPARQL Query spec
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
- Minutes from Today's Meeting
- Review of Entailment Regimes
- Re: Comment response for DB-7a
- Comment response for DB-7a
Monday, 7 November 2011
- Re: Agenda: SPARQL TC 2011-11-08
- Re: Agenda: SPARQL TC 2011-11-08
- Re: Comment response for JB-8
- Comment response for JB-8
- Re: Comment Response BT-3 for review
- Re: Comment Response BT-2 for review
- Agenda: SPARQL TC 2011-11-08
- Re: Comment Response BT-3 for review
- Re: Comment Response BT-2 for review
- Comment Response BT-3 for review
- Comment Response BT-2 for review
- Re: ASK and solution modifiers.
- ASK and solution modifiers.
Friday, 4 November 2011
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
- Fwd: Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
- Re: Comment responses ready : JL-1 (sort blank nodes) and DB-14 (str() on blank nodes).
- Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
- Re: draft response to DB-6
- Graph terminology from RDF-WG
- Comment responses ready : JL-1 (sort blank nodes) and DB-14 (str() on blank nodes).
- Comment responses for MS-[2-7]
- Re: CommentResponse:JB-7
- Minutes of telecon 2011-11-01
- SPARQL Teleconference Starts in 40 minutes
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- Re: datatype issues in testsuite
- Re: pubrules checked for Overview document...
- pubrules checked for Overview document...
- Re: Apologies
- Re: CommentResponse:JB-7
- Apologies
- Re: CommentResponse:JB-7
- CommentResponse:JB-7
- Re: draft response to DB-6
Monday, 31 October 2011
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- Re: datatype issues in testsuite
- draft response to DB-6
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- Re: rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- rq25 updates (STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, REPLACE and more)
- Re: Another Typo: Re: Two Sections numbered 13.3.1 in Query doc
Friday, 28 October 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Monday, 24 October 2011
- Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change
- Important! Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change
- Re: comment response HS-1
- Re: comment response HS-1
- comment response HS-1
Sunday, 23 October 2011
Friday, 21 October 2011
Thursday, 20 October 2011
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
- CommentResponse:DB-14a
- Re: Format URIs for SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats
- Re: Two Sections numbered 13.3.1 in Query doc
- Format URIs for SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
- Two Sections numbered 13.3.1 in Query doc
- Re: Discussion on DB-12?
- Minutes SPARQL TC 2011-10-18
- RE: Apologies
- Apologies
- Re: CommentResponse:HS-1
- CommentResponse:HS-1
- Re: Discussion on DB-12?
- Re: renaming Service Description properties
- Re: Discussion on DB-12?
Monday, 17 October 2011
- Re: Minor error in SPARQL Update 4.2.5
- Re: Discussion on DB-12?
- ACTION-530 Check update comments (with paul/alex) and summarize critical issues, if any on mail
- Re: opinions on comment DB-9?
- SPARQL TC 2011-10-18 Agenda
- opinions on comment DB-9?
- Discussion on DB-12?
- Re: draft response JBolleman-1, JBolleman-2
- Re: draft response JBolleman-1, JBolleman-2
- Re: draft response JBolleman-1, JBolleman-2
- Re: Minor error in SPARQL Update 4.2.5
- Re: ACTION-540 Review the overview document
- Re: ACTION-540 Review the overview document
- Re: Format URIs for SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats
- Re: ACTION-540 Review the overview document
Sunday, 16 October 2011
Saturday, 15 October 2011
Friday, 14 October 2011
- Re: Service Description implemented in RedStore
- SERVICE ?var [was: Re: test case changes]
- Minor error in SPARQL Update 4.2.5
- Re: Fwd: Format URIs for SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats
- Re: Service Description implemented in RedStore
- Re: Format URIs for SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats
- Re: renaming Service Description properties
- Service Description implemented in RedStore
- Fwd: Format URIs for SPARQL 1.1 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
Monday, 10 October 2011
Sunday, 9 October 2011
Saturday, 8 October 2011
- Re: MS-6 D-Entailment and fixed datatype map
- Re: Comment JB-6
- Re: Draft response to BT-1
- Re: Overview doc now on CVS ("activating" ACTION-540 & ACTION-541 )
- Re: Overview doc now on CVS ("activating" ACTION-540 & ACTION-541 )
Friday, 7 October 2011
- Re: ACTION-515 completed: Review the overview document
- Re: Draft response to BT-1
- Re: Draft response to BT-1
- Comment JB-6
- Draft response to BT-1
- Pre-LC comments consolidation
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
- Re: new tests (ACTION-538)
- Re: Possible Bug in SPARQL 1.1 Grammar
- Re: Possible Bug in SPARQL 1.1 Grammar
- Re: Possible Bug in SPARQL 1.1 Grammar
- Re: new tests (ACTION-538)
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
- new tests (ACTION-538)
- Re: Possible Bug in SPARQL 1.1 Grammar
- today's minutes
- Re: xpath string index function
- Re: Comment responses awaiting approval from WG
- Re: Summary of (substantive) change requests from post-LC comments
- Re: xpath string index function
- 2011-10-04 SPARQL TC
- Re: Apologies for 4th Oct
- MS-6 D-Entailment and fixed datatype map
- Apologies for 4th Oct
- Re: xpath string index function
- aggregate test case missing
- Re: xpath string index function
- ACTION-533 done: Add a link to the overview do to the wiki and check whether we link to latest WDs in general
- Re: xpath string index function