public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2010 by date

Friday, 31 December 2010

• Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 29 December 2010

• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly Andy Seaborne
• Re: Details of dateTime operations Steve Harris
• Re: To SPARQL Last Call - attention editors Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 28 December 2010

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm

Monday, 27 December 2010

• Re: Details of dateTime operations Andy Seaborne
• Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Andy Seaborne

Friday, 24 December 2010

• WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 23 December 2010

• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Alexandre Passant
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Alexandre Passant
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Alexandre Passant
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Andy Seaborne
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Alexandre Passant
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results Steve Harris
• Format of SPARQL Update results Alexandre Passant
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Alexandre Passant
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Umberto Straccia

Wednesday, 22 December 2010

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Guido Vetere
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Gregory Williams
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Andy Seaborne
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Gregory Williams
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Sandro Hawke
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Gregory Williams
• ?graph= to use only absolute URIs Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Andy Seaborne
• 2010-12-21 TC minutes ... Axel Polleres
• Change of status Paul Gearon
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Steve Harris
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Axel Polleres
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Steve Harris
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Andy Seaborne
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Andy Seaborne
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Steve Harris
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Guido Vetere
• Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Axel Polleres
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Steve Harris
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• ACTION-209, ACTION-328 Steve Harris
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Steve Harris
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Steve Harris
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Steve Harris
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Steve Harris
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Polleres, Axel
• Re: Update security issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• To SPARQL Last Call - attention editors Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Update security issues Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Polleres, Axel
• ISSUE-64: Should we incude an entailment regime for OWL with non-distinguished variables and no result bnodes? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• new comment on HTTP Update Protocol... volunteers? Axel Polleres
• "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Axel Polleres

Monday, 20 December 2010

• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) Axel Polleres
• Re: Changes to editor's draft of the SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Protocol Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Changes to editor's draft of the SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Protocol Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) Axel Polleres
• Changes to editor's draft of the SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Protocol Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Andy Seaborne
• rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Axel Polleres
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Steve Harris
• Re: new version of fed query Steve Harris
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• Re: new version of fed query Andy Seaborne
• Fwd: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: new version of fed query Carlos Buil Aranda
• new version of fed query Carlos Buil Aranda
• property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Axel Polleres
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Axel Polleres

Sunday, 19 December 2010

• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Andy Seaborne

Friday, 17 December 2010

• Re: Another thing on property paths... Andy Seaborne
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Axel Polleres
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Andy Seaborne
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Andy Seaborne
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Axel Polleres
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Axel Polleres
• Re: Another thing on property paths... Andy Seaborne
• Another thing on property paths... Axel Polleres

Thursday, 16 December 2010

• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 15 December 2010

• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... Axel Polleres
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... Steve Harris
• Re: Dave Beckett's Comment Steve Harris

Tuesday, 14 December 2010

• Update security issues Paul Gearon
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) Paul Gearon
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) Andy Seaborne
• HTTP-update-ISSUES, feedback for next TC, all? Axel Polleres
• ACTION-347 done Axel Polleres
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... Axel Polleres
• This week's minutes Birte Glimm
• last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-12-07 Axel Polleres
• Call for issues and comment on JSON result format Andy Seaborne
• Re: Dave Beckett's Comment Axel Polleres
• SPARQL 1.1 document updated (ISSUE-59) Alexandre Passant
• Draft comment to MS-1 (ACTION-335) Alexandre Passant
• Re: critical open ACTIONS for LC... Andy Seaborne

Monday, 13 December 2010

• critical open ACTIONS for LC... Axel Polleres
• ACTION-325 completed... Axel Polleres
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... Andy Seaborne
• stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-14 - agenda for tomorrow Gregory Williams
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-14 - agenda for tomorrow Axel Polleres
• SPARQL TC 2010-12-14 - agenda for tomorrow Axel Polleres
• Regrets Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Andy Seaborne
• Re: Importing RIF Axel Polleres
• Re: Dave Beckett's Comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: Importing RIF Ivan Herman
• Dave Beckett's Comment Steve Harris
• Re: Importing RIF Axel Polleres
• Re: Importing RIF Ivan Herman

Sunday, 12 December 2010

• Re: Importing RIF Birte Glimm
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Steve Harris
• Re: Importing RIF Axel Polleres
• Re: Importing RIF Polleres, Axel
• Re: Importing RIF Ivan Herman

Saturday, 11 December 2010

• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Birte Glimm

Friday, 10 December 2010

• Importing RIF Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Polleres, Axel
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Guido Vetere
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Enrico Franconi
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Enrico Franconi
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 8 December 2010

• Reminder: SPARQL Protocol teleconference in 30 minutes Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Steve Harris
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Birte Glimm
• Regrets Nicholas Humfrey

Monday, 6 December 2010

• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Guido Vetere
• SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Paul Gearon
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Paul Gearon
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Guido Vetere
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Steve Harris
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Steve Harris
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Andy Seaborne
• Re: Details of string operations Steve Harris

Sunday, 5 December 2010

• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Details of string operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Details of string operations Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm

Saturday, 4 December 2010

• Re: Details of string operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions Sandro Hawke

Friday, 3 December 2010

• md5sum and sha1sum functions Paul Gearon
• Re: Details of dateTime operations Steve Harris
• Re: Details of dateTime operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Details of dateTime operations Steve Harris
• Re: Details of dateTime operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Details of dateTime operations Steve Harris
• Details of dateTime operations Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 2 December 2010

• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Details of string operations Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Details of string operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Andy Seaborne
• Re: Details of string operations Steve Harris
• Re: Details of string operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Details of string operations Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL Namespaces Gregory Williams
• Re: Details of string operations Gregory Williams
• Re: Details of string operations Gregory Williams

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

• Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) Birte Glimm
• Details of string operations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) Steve Harris
• Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Steve Harris
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc Steve Harris
• Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

• Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Chimezie Ogbuji
• SPARQL WG minutes, Tues. Nov. 30, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm
• Re: ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm
• Re: ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation Gregory Williams
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Appologies Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• ACTION-326 + ACTION-327 ... test README.html updated... Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Birte Glimm
• ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Bijan Parsia
• Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime Enrico Franconi
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL WG Agenda -- Tues. Nov. 30, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 29 November 2010

• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Andy Seaborne
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc Andy Seaborne
• Changes to Query 1.1 doc Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn Steve Harris
• Proposed RAND() defn Steve Harris

Sunday, 28 November 2010

• Re: function library summary and issues Steve Harris
• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: function library summary and issues Steve Harris
• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: function library summary and issues Steve Harris
• Re: function library summary and issues Ivan Herman

Saturday, 27 November 2010

• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne

Friday, 26 November 2010

• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Chimezie Ogbuji
• Grammar updated Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 25 November 2010

• Re: POST & HTTP Update Steve Harris
• Re: POST & HTTP Update Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Andy Seaborne
• Re: POST & HTTP Update Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Steve Harris
• POST & HTTP Update Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Steve Harris
• SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload Andy Seaborne
• Re: function library summary and issues Steve Harris

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: function library summary and issues Steve Harris
• Re: function library summary and issues Gregory Williams
• SPARQL Protocol Working Session TC - Wed. Dec. 8 @ 11am ET Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: function library summary and issues Steve Harris
• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL WG minutes for 2010-11-23 Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 23 November 2010

• SPARQL WG minutes for 2010-11-23 Lee Feigenbaum
• Scheduling poll for SPARQL Protocol working session telecon Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Regrets for today Souripriya Das
• Re: Regrets for today Chimezie Ogbuji
• Regrets for today Matthew Perry
• Regrets for today Nicholas Humfrey
• Regrets for today Olivier Corby

Monday, 22 November 2010

• TC 2010-11-23 Axel Polleres

Thursday, 18 November 2010

• Re: CASE Kendall Clark
• Re: CASE Andy Seaborne
• Re: CASE Paul Gearon
• CASE Lee Feigenbaum

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

• Re: xs:string return types: [was Re: function library summary and issues] Andy Seaborne
• Re: xs:string return types: [was Re: function library summary and issues] Steve Harris
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Steve Harris
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Andy Seaborne
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Axel Polleres
• xs:string return types: [was Re: function library summary and issues] Andy Seaborne
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Andy Seaborne
• Re: function library summary and issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Axel Polleres
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Update shortcuts summary and discussion Alexandre Passant
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Steve Harris
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Axel Polleres
• Please *all* comment on the comments page! Axel Polleres
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Steve Harris
• Kjetil's comments Axel Polleres
• draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

• function library summary and issues Axel Polleres
• minutes from today's TC Axel Polleres
• Update shortcuts summary and discussion Axel Polleres

Monday, 15 November 2010

• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-11-16 Agenda Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-11-16 Agenda Lee Feigenbaum
• SPARQL TC 2010-11-16 Agenda Axel Polleres

Thursday, 11 November 2010

• Topics for next week - shortcuts in update, group by expressions, Lee Feigenbaum

Wednesday, 10 November 2010

• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Alexandre Passant
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 Alexandre Passant
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 Alexandre Passant

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Axel Polleres
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Axel Polleres
• Regrets Nicholas Humfrey
• Regrets for today Olivier Corby
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris
• SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris

Monday, 8 November 2010

• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Minutes from SPARQL WG, 2010-11-02 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 7 November 2010

• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Axel Polleres
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Axel Polleres

Friday, 5 November 2010

• Re: Updated delete tests Matt Perry
• Re: ISSUE-59 - Shortcuts for Update Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 4 November 2010

• Translation of SPARQL syntax to SPARQL algebra Andy Seaborne
• Re: More minimalistic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL protocol Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL XML Result errata Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 3 November 2010

• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Paul Gearon
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Paul Gearon
• Re: grouping by expressions Steve Harris
• Re: grouping by expressions Gregory Williams
• Re: grouping by expressions Andy Seaborne
• Re: functions detail: lang/langmatches Steve Harris
• Re: grouping by expressions Steve Harris
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Matt Perry
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Paul Gearon
• Re: functions detail: lang/langmatches Axel Polleres
• Re: functions detail: lang/langmatches Lee Feigenbaum
• functions detail: lang/langmatches Axel Polleres
• Re: grouping by expressions Andy Seaborne
• Re: grouping by expressions Steve Harris
• Re: grouping by expressions Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris
• Re: grouping by expressions Steve Harris
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Andy Seaborne
• Re: grouping by expressions Andy Seaborne
• Re: grouping by expressions Steve Harris
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris
• Re: grouping by expressions Gregory Williams
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Paul Gearon

Tuesday, 2 November 2010

• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Steve Harris
• what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? Lee Feigenbaum
• grouping by expressions Lee Feigenbaum
• generating tests overview page Lee Feigenbaum
• Regrets Souripriya Das
• Re: Updated delete tests Matt Perry
• Re: Updated delete tests Matt Perry
• ISSUE-59 - Shortcuts for Update Alexandre Passant
• Re: Comments responses Axel Polleres
• Re: FILTER inside FILTER? Birte Glimm
• Re: Comments responses Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. November 2, 2010 Sandro Hawke
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. November 2, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: BIND - a question of detail Lee Feigenbaum
• apologies for tomorrow Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Comments responses Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Updated delete tests Gregory Williams

Monday, 1 November 2010

• Comments responses Andy Seaborne
• Re: Updated delete tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: FILTER inside FILTER? Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL WG Alert! Teleconference one hour _earlier_ outside of the US this week Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Meeting minutes Lee Feigenbaum
• FILTER inside FILTER? Birte Glimm
• Re: More minimalistic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Updated delete tests Matt Perry
• Re: Updated delete tests Matt Perry

Saturday, 30 October 2010

• Re: Updated delete tests Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

• Updated delete tests Matt Perry
• Re: More minimalisic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) Birte Glimm
• Fwd: Beware of W3C Accounting Phishing Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

• Re: More minimalisic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) Gregory Williams
• More minimalisic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) Birte Glimm
• Meeting minutes Paul Gearon

Saturday, 23 October 2010

• next week agenda (2010-10-26) Axel Polleres

Thursday, 21 October 2010

• Re: BIND - a question of detail Gregory Williams
• BIND - a question of detail Andy Seaborne
• BIND: some tests Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

• Minutes from today's TC Axel Polleres
• Re: RV-4 Sandro Hawke
• RV-4 Steve Harris
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 Alexandre Passant
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Axel Polleres
• Proposed response to DB-1 Alexandre Passant
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Andy Seaborne
• Regrets for today's TC Olivier Corby
• Re: yacker grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: yacker grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: yacker grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• yacker grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 18 October 2010

• Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary. Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Gregory Williams
• Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary. Alexandre Passant
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 Andy Seaborne
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Andy Seaborne
• Agenda 2010-10-19 Axel Polleres
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Axel Polleres
• Fixing the update test case vocabulary. Axel Polleres

Saturday, 16 October 2010

• Proposed response to DR-1 Andy Seaborne
• Proposed response to JC-3 Andy Seaborne
• Re: RK-1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Andy Seaborne

Friday, 15 October 2010

• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Andy Seaborne
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Matt Perry
• preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... Axel Polleres
• WD Publications are out... Axel Polleres

Thursday, 14 October 2010

• Re: RK-1 Gregory Williams
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Axel Polleres
• Re: RK-1 Axel Polleres
• Re: RK-1 Gregory Williams
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" Axel Polleres
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" Steve Harris
• Re: GROUP question Steve Harris
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" Andy Seaborne
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" Axel Polleres
• Re: GROUP question Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" Andy Seaborne
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Andy Seaborne
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Axel Polleres
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Andy Seaborne
• Re: GROUP question Andy Seaborne
• RK-1 Axel Polleres
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 Axel Polleres
• another question on "SELECT *" Axel Polleres
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 Steve Harris
• Re: GROUP question Axel Polleres
• Re: GROUP question Steve Harris
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Axel Polleres
• GROUP question Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Lee Feigenbaum
• BIND, FILTERs and BGPs Andy Seaborne
• Document Preparation for Publication Birte Glimm
• draft response GK-3 Axel Polleres
• Re: response to RV-4 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: + for fn:concat Axel Polleres
• Comments GK-1 and 2 Steve Harris
• response to RV-4 Axel Polleres
• minutes from today's RC... Axel Polleres
• Re: short before the call... remaining issues on LET/BIND/ASSIGN Andy Seaborne
• regrets for today's meeting Souri Das
• Re: short before the call... remaining issues on LET/BIND/ASSIGN Axel Polleres
• short before the call... remaining issues on LET/BIND/ASSIGN Axel Polleres

Sunday, 10 October 2010

• [protocol] [SPARQL-http] HTTP status codes Andy Seaborne

Friday, 8 October 2010

• Re: some more comments on Fed query doc... (was: Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)) Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Preparing a document for publication Andy Seaborne
• Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-10-12 Axel Polleres
• Re: Preparing a document for publication Axel Polleres

Thursday, 7 October 2010

• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Steve Harris
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? Steve Harris
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: http-rdf-update and the default graph Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Aggregates question... Andy Seaborne
• Re: Aggregates question... Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 Axel Polleres
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? Steve Harris
• Re: Aggregates question... Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 Alexandre Passant
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 Alexandre Passant
• Re: Formatting issues (Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)) Ivan Herman
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Alexandre Passant
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Axel Polleres
• SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Axel Polleres
• Re: some more comments on Fed query doc... (was: Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)) Axel Polleres
• More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? Axel Polleres
• Aggregates question... Axel Polleres

Wednesday, 6 October 2010

• Preparing a document for publication Birte Glimm
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Axel Polleres
• Re: Formatting issues (Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)) Birte Glimm
• Re: Question about BINDINGS Andy Seaborne
• Re: Question about BINDINGS Axel Polleres
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Ivan Herman
• Re: Question about BINDINGS Andy Seaborne
• Formatting issues (Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)) Ivan Herman
• Re: NOT EXISTS {P} = ! (EXISTS {P} ) , yes? Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

• MINUS vs NOT EXISTS question... and some suggestion for rewording. Axel Polleres
• NOT EXISTS {P} = ! (EXISTS {P} ) , yes? Axel Polleres
• Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 Steve Harris
• Question about BINDINGS Axel Polleres
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Chimezie Ogbuji
• some more comments on Fed query doc... (was: Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)) Axel Polleres
• minutes from today's TC Axel Polleres
• ISSUE-63: Handling of default graph in HTTP update protocol SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
• At risk Paul Gearon
• Re: Agenda TC 2010-10-05 Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 4 October 2010

• Review of Update Formal Model Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda TC 2010-10-05 Steve Harris
• Agenda TC 2010-10-05 Axel Polleres

Sunday, 3 October 2010

• Re: LET / BIND / Assignment test cases (ISSUE-57) Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Birte Glimm
• SPARQL Update 1.1 ready for review Alexandre Passant
• Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 Alexandre Passant
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Alexandre Passant
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Ivan Herman

Saturday, 2 October 2010

• Re: charter extension/updating the schedule Steve Harris
• Re: charter extension/updating the schedule Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Birte Glimm

Friday, 1 October 2010

• charter extension/updating the schedule Axel Polleres
• Re: [tests] Test for GROUP BY Steve Harris
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Ivan Herman
• [tests] Test for GROUP BY Andy Seaborne
• Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 30 September 2010

• Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 Axel Polleres

Last message date: Friday, 31 December 2010 16:02:30 UTC