public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2010 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

Re: [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 Axel Polleres
comment on update Axel Polleres
Re: Syntax of MINUS Paul Gearon
Re: Syntax of MINUS Paul Gearon
Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS Steve Harris
Re: [ACTION-218] wrong header, should have been ACTION-218 instead Andy Seaborne
Re: [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 Andy Seaborne
Re: Syntax of MINUS Alexandre Passant
Re: Syntax of MINUS Andy Seaborne
Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS Andy Seaborne
Re: Syntax of MINUS Alexandre Passant
Re: Syntax of MINUS Steve Harris
Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS Steve Harris
Re: Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS Ivan Herman
Syntax of MINUS Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Re: [ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 Steve Harris
[ACTION-207] draft response NA-1 Axel Polleres
[ACTION-218] wrong header, should have been ACTION-218 instead (was: [ACTION-207] draft response ED-1) Axel Polleres
[ACTION-207] draft response ED-1 Axel Polleres
Re: Aggregate extensibility Steve Harris
Re: Aggregate extensibility Andy Seaborne
Re: Aggregate extensibility Steve Harris
Re: Aggregate extensibility Andy Seaborne
today's TC minutes ... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-03-30 Axel Polleres
Re: Aggregate extensibility Axel Polleres
Re: Aggregate extensibility Ivan Mikhailov
Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft Andy Seaborne
Examples of MINUS and NOT EXISTS Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft Ivan Herman

Monday, 29 March 2010

Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Axel Polleres
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Andy Seaborne
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Andy Seaborne
Re: Aggregate extensibility Axel Polleres
RE: Aggregate extensibility Orri Erling
F2F minutes (was: SPARQL TC 2010-03-30 Agenda) Axel Polleres
SPARQL TC 2010-03-30 Agenda Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft Steve Harris
Re: SPARQL Federation Extensions draft Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 27 March 2010

thanks! Lee Feigenbaum
SPARQL Federation Extensions draft Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 26 March 2010

Re: more on RIF entailment regime Chimezie Ogbuji
Aggregate extensibility Axel Polleres
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Axel Polleres
Re: more on RIF entailment regime Ivan Herman
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Axel Polleres

Thursday, 25 March 2010

Re: more on RIF entailment regime Axel Polleres
slight time change on the agenda tomorrow... in cases someone wants to dial in Axel Polleres
ISSUE-56: Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: more on RIF entailment regime Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: SPARQL update and datasets Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL update and datasets Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL update and datasets Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris Andy Seaborne
Re: DAWG test suite & process overview Axel Polleres
Re: more on RIF entailment regime Axel Polleres
more on RIF entailment regime Axel Polleres
Entailment regimes doc comments (typo, D-Entailment, RIF Core Entailment) Axel Polleres
SPARQL update and datasets Lee Feigenbaum
DAWG test suite & process overview Lee Feigenbaum

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

Re: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris Paul Gearon
Re: [testcases] some PropertyPaths test cases... Andy Seaborne
[testcases] some PropertyPaths test cases... Axel Polleres
Fw: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... Polleres, Axel
Re: [test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... Andy Seaborne
[test cases] ACTION-191 starting with some test cases for aggregates... Axel Polleres
example in Section 9 in query 1.1 Axel Polleres
Fwd: Re: sparql 1.1 work in progress grammar Andy Seaborne
Fwd: SPARQL update (draft) question on LOAD uris Andy Seaborne
Re: HTTP PATCH? Andy Seaborne
Re: HTTP PATCH? Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: HTTP PATCH? Steve Harris
Re: HTTP PATCH? Chimezie Ogbuji
the HTTP PATCH spec Ivan Herman
HTTP PATCH? Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

Re: last actions before F2F @all Andy Seaborne
F2F3 Birte Glimm
last actions before F2F @all Axel Polleres
SPARQL WG minutes 23 Mar 2010 Birte Glimm
Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Andy Seaborne
Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Steve Harris
Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Andy Seaborne
Regrets David Charboneau
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 Ivan Herman
F2F3 Agenda Annotated Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 22 March 2010

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 Sandro Hawke
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 23, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: F2F location Lee Feigenbaum
Re: F2F location Lee Feigenbaum
F2F location Alexandre Passant

Sunday, 21 March 2010

Re: Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2) Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-ENT] Updated doc with D-Entailment, revised Direct Semantics and proofs Ivan Herman

Saturday, 20 March 2010

Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey Gregory Williams
Comment Response to Rob Vesse (RV-2) Gregory Williams

Friday, 19 March 2010

[TF-ENT] Updated doc with D-Entailment, revised Direct Semantics and proofs Birte Glimm
Re: Semantics of multi-expression aggregators Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

Semantics of multi-expression aggregators Steve Harris

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Andy Seaborne
Re: Property Paths Update (negated property classes) Steve Harris
Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Steve Harris
Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Property Paths Update Steve Harris
Re: Combined grammar (work in progress) Andy Seaborne
Combined grammar (work in progress) Andy Seaborne
Property Paths Update (negated property classes) Andy Seaborne
Property Path Update (doc issues) Andy Seaborne
Property Paths Update Andy Seaborne
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 16, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 15 March 2010

Sunday, 14 March 2010

Re: Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 13 March 2010

Re: Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting Steve Harris
Re: Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Ivan Herman

Friday, 12 March 2010

Nested CONSTRUCTs and Blank node minting Axel Polleres
Some Embedding necessary for RIF-Simple - Was Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Updated F2F3 Agenda Lee Feigenbaum
Re: [TF-LIB] BNode Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] BNode Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-LIB] BNode Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-LIB] BNode Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm

Thursday, 11 March 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] BNode Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? Steve Harris
Re: Base URI in updates? Andy Seaborne
Re: Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? Andy Seaborne
Re: Where operation delimiters matter Andy Seaborne
Do we need DELETE and CLEAR? Steve Harris
Where operation delimiters matter Steve Harris

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda for this week's ent. regimes teleconf Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (was: Finalizing built-ins) Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Base URI in updates? Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Agenda for today in 2 hours Sandro Hawke
apologies Paul Gearon
Agenda for today in 2 hours Lee Feigenbaum
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Ivan Herman
At risk for telecon Steve Harris

Monday, 8 March 2010

Not yet an agenda for tomorrow Lee Feigenbaum
Regrets for tomorrow's teleconference Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Steve Harris
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Steve Harris
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
[TF-ENT] Agenda for this week's ent. regimes teleconf Birte Glimm
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Steve Harris
Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 Ivan Herman
Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 Axel Polleres
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Steve Harris
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Ivan Herman

Sunday, 7 March 2010

Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Andy Seaborne
Re: F2F3 agenda and time slots Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Birte Glimm
Re: Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Steve Harris
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Steve Harris
Proposed definition of ExprMultiSet Andy Seaborne
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Andy Seaborne
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Lee Feigenbaum
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Andy Seaborne
[TF-Ent] RIF Core Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji

Saturday, 6 March 2010

F2F3 agenda and time slots Axel Polleres

Friday, 5 March 2010

Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey Gregory Williams
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Gregory Williams
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Andy Seaborne
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Lee Feigenbaum
ISSUE-55: Can/how can a separator string be supplied to the GROUP_CONCAT aggregate? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Andy Seaborne
Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. Steve Harris
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Sandro Hawke
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. Ivan Herman
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Ivan Herman
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Andy Seaborne
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Axel Polleres
Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT() Steve Harris
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. Steve Harris
Re: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations Steve Harris
Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey Steve Harris
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Andy Seaborne
Re: D-enatilment and canonicalization Polleres, Axel
D-enatilment and canonicalization Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications Polleres, Axel
Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-PP] cycles - simple or a walk Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 4 March 2010

Re: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations Sandro Hawke
Re: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications Axel Polleres
Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey Gregory Williams
Re: draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey Andy Seaborne
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Steve Harris
[TF-PP] Duplicates and simple property path expressions. Andy Seaborne
[TF-PP] cycles - simple or a walk Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Re: DELETE and blank nodes Birte Glimm
Entailment Regimes meeting notes Sandro Hawke
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Andy Seaborne
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March Birte Glimm
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Birte Glimm
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Birte Glimm
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Steve Harris
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Paul Gearon
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Andy Seaborne
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Andy Seaborne
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Birte Glimm
Re: Errors from entailment regimes Birte Glimm
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Andy Seaborne
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Steve Harris
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Andy Seaborne
Re: Errors from entailment regimes Andy Seaborne
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Ivan Herman
Re: Errors from entailment regimes Ivan Herman
Re: DELETE and blank nodes Steve Harris
DELETE and blank nodes Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

Re: Errors from entailment regimes Lee Feigenbaum
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Gregory Williams
Errors from entailment regimes Birte Glimm
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats Andy Seaborne
SPARQL WG Minutes - March 2, 2010 Sandro Hawke
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 Souripriya Das

Monday, 1 March 2010

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 Steve Harris
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats Lee Feigenbaum
SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 28 February 2010

Re: [TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March Birte Glimm
draft response to Nicholas J Humfrey Gregory Williams
SPARQL 1.1 Protocol formats Gregory Williams

Thursday, 25 February 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

[TF-ENT] 24th Feb teleconf summary Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Axel Polleres
[TF-Ent] next teleconf 3rd March Birte Glimm
[TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications Birte Glimm
[TF-ENT] Notes from 24th Feb teleconf Sandro Hawke
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Birte Glimm
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Axel Polleres
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Jos de Bruijn
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Birte Glimm
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Birte Glimm
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Axel Polleres
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Jos de Bruijn
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Axel Polleres
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Jos de Bruijn
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Axel Polleres
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. Jos de Bruijn
Re: finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf) Axel Polleres
finite approximation of the minimal Herbrand model for a RIF Core/BLD ruleset. (was: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf) Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 23 February 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Steve Harris
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Paul Gearon
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Minutes from 2010-02-23 Gregory Williams
SPARQL Protocol open issues summary David Charboneau
Regrets Alexandre Passant
Re: [TF-LIB] BNode (was: Finalizing built-ins) Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Steve Harris
[TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins Andy Seaborne
Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Steve Harris
Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Axel Polleres
Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Steve Harris
Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Ivan Herman

Monday, 22 February 2010

Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Sandro Hawke
Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Andy Seaborne
Re: Test framework for Update Andy Seaborne
Re: Test framework for Update Paul Gearon
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Andy Seaborne
Re: Test framework for Update Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 21 February 2010

[TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf Birte Glimm
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 Lee Feigenbaum

Friday, 19 February 2010

Re: Pending issues for update Lee Feigenbaum
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Ivan Herman
Re: [TF ENT] RIF teleconf Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Birte Glimm
Re: Leaving the working group. Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Ivan Herman

Thursday, 18 February 2010

Leaving the working group. Luke Wilson-Mawer
[TF ENT] RIF teleconf Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Birte Glimm
Fwd: 2010 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Confirmations Lee Feigenbaum
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Birte Glimm
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Gregory Williams
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Birte Glimm
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Lee Feigenbaum
Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Steve Harris
Re: [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Paul Gearon
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Gregory Williams

Tuesday, 16 February 2010

Re: [TF-ENT] RIF teleconf Chimezie Ogbuji
[TF-ENT] RIF teleconf Birte Glimm
[TF-ENT] Entailment regimes doc update Birte Glimm
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Lee Feigenbaum
Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? Paul Gearon
Re: on the alternative aggregate proposal (ED-1)... Lee Feigenbaum
Today's minutes available at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16 Axel Polleres
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Ivan Herman
ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Birte Glimm
Pending issues for update Paul Gearon
on the alternative aggregate proposal (ED-1)... Axel Polleres
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Birte Glimm
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Polleres, Axel
SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Feb. 16 Lee Feigenbaum
At risk for 16th Feb Paul Gearon

Monday, 15 February 2010

Re: Service description open questions (was: Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled.) Gregory Williams
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Birte Glimm
Apologies Matt Perry
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Axel Polleres

Sunday, 14 February 2010

Re: Returning datasets (was: Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...) Steve Harris
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Steve Harris

Saturday, 13 February 2010

Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Ivan Herman

Friday, 12 February 2010

Returning datasets (was: Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...) Andy Seaborne
Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) Birte Glimm
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... Axel Polleres
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Steve Harris
Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... Steve Harris
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Andy Seaborne
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Steve Harris
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Steve Harris
Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... Andy Seaborne
Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... Axel Polleres
Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... Andy Seaborne
side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE... Axel Polleres
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Ivan Herman

Thursday, 11 February 2010

Re: Entailment regimes open issues Birte Glimm
Re: Draft response for comment N3-1 Lee Feigenbaum
Service description open questions (was: Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled.) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Andy Seaborne
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Draft Response to ED-1 Lee Feigenbaum
Draft Response to ED-1 Steve Harris

Wednesday, 10 February 2010

Re: ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) Ivan Mikhailov
Draft response for comment N3-1 Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Steve Harris
SPARQL TC minutes from 2010-02-09 available... Axel Polleres
SPARQL TC minutes from 2010-01-26 nicely formatted... Axel Polleres
Re: ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) Axel Polleres
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Andy Seaborne
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Steve Harris
ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 Axel Polleres
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Andy Seaborne
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Steve Harris
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 Andy Seaborne
Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. Andy Seaborne

Monday, 8 February 2010

Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. Gregory Williams
Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Ivan Mikhailov
Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Andy Seaborne
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Birte Glimm
Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) Andy Seaborne
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Steve Harris
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Ivan Herman
Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) Birte Glimm
RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues) Sandro Hawke
Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Ivan Mikhailov
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Steve Harris
Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Ivan Mikhailov
Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) Steve Harris
Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 Axel Polleres
Re: Entailment regimes open issues Ivan Herman

Sunday, 7 February 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] IN operator Steve Harris
[TF-LIB] IN operator Andy Seaborne
Entailment regimes open issues Birte Glimm

Friday, 5 February 2010

Thursday, 4 February 2010

Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. Gregory Williams
Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths Ivan Mikhailov

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS Steve Harris
Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates Steve Harris
Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths Steve Harris
Re: ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS Lee Feigenbaum
ISSUE-29: MINUS / NOT EXISTS Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths Andy Seaborne
ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates Andy Seaborne
Re: Finalizing syntax Andy Seaborne
Re: Summary of open issues on query. Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Summary of open issues on query. Steve Harris
Re: [TF-PP] Property sets in paths Steve Harris
Re: Finalizing syntax Steve Harris
[TF-PP] Property sets in paths Andy Seaborne
Finalizing syntax Andy Seaborne
Prioritized issues / Query Andy Seaborne
Summary of open issues on query. Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Re: SPARQL TC today cancelled. Lee Feigenbaum
SPARQL TC today cancelled. Axel Polleres
Regrets Olivier Corby

Monday, 1 February 2010

Re: Apologies Luke Wilson-Mawer
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths Andy Seaborne
Apologies Steve Harris
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths Steve Harris
Fwd: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths Andy Seaborne

Friday, 29 January 2010

Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Andy Seaborne
Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Sandro Hawke
Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Steve Harris
Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Andy Seaborne
Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Sandro Hawke
Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Steve Harris
Re: Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Andy Seaborne
Re: Outstanding response to Leigh Dodds Ivan Herman

Thursday, 28 January 2010

Outstanding response to Leigh Dodds Chimezie Ogbuji
Drafts published... Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths Ian Jacobs
Re: Response to comments of Enrico Birte Glimm
Re: Response to comments of Enrico Ivan Herman
Re: Response to comments of Enrico Birte Glimm
Discussion of property paths, SPARQL and N3 Andy Seaborne
Fwd: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs Axel Polleres
Re: Link checker on property-paths Polleres, Axel
Link checker on property-paths Andy Seaborne
Re: Response to comments of Enrico Ivan Herman
Re: Response to comments of Enrico Birte Glimm
Re: Response to comments of Enrico Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Response to comments of Enrico Birte Glimm
Re: Query 1.1 Working Draft : 2010 Jan publication : link fixing. Sandro Hawke
Re: Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs Axel Polleres
Wiki - testing pages Andy Seaborne
Query 1.1 Working Draft : 2010 Jan publication : link fixing. Andy Seaborne
Re: Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs Paul Gearon
Fixed some broken fragments in Protocol 1.1 Overview.xml David Charboneau
broken links/fragments in the entailment doc Birte Glimm
Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs Sandro Hawke
Re: SPARQL TC 2010-01-29 Agenda Chimezie Ogbuji
Regrets for today's TC Passant, Alexandre

Monday, 25 January 2010

SPARQL TC 2010-01-29 Agenda Axel Polleres

Saturday, 23 January 2010

Re: Checking documents for publication Birte Glimm

Friday, 22 January 2010

Re: Checking documents for publication Axel Polleres
Re: datasets in update Andy Seaborne
Checking documents for publication Birte Glimm

Thursday, 21 January 2010

Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 (Various) Ian Jacobs

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

SPARQL WG Minutes 2010-01-19 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Apologies Luke Wilson-Mawer
Re: Update Paul Gearon
Update Olivier Corby
Apologies Steve Harris
Re: datasets in update Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Update changes Andy Seaborne
Re: datasets in update Andy Seaborne

Monday, 18 January 2010

Re: Update concern Steve Harris
Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol David Charboneau
datasets in update (was: Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Update changes Paul Gearon
Re: Update concern Paul Gearon
Update concern Steve Harris
Re: Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today Axel Polleres
Re: Update changes Andy Seaborne
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 19, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Update changes Lee Feigenbaum

Saturday, 16 January 2010

Regrets for telecon 19/Jan Andy Seaborne

Friday, 15 January 2010

Update changes Paul Gearon
Re: Service Description Vocabulary Gregory Williams
Re: Service Description Vocabulary Ivan Herman
Service Description Vocabulary Gregory Williams
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Richard Newman
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Paul Gearon

Thursday, 14 January 2010

Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Richard Newman
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Richard Newman
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Paul Gearon
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Paul Gearon
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Andy Seaborne
Re: Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm
Re: entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres
Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm
Re: entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm
Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today Axel Polleres
Re: entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres
minutes from today http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-12 Axel Polleres
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres
Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm
Re: Update on Update Axel Polleres
Re: Property Path Profiles Matt Perry
Re: entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres
Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" Andy Seaborne
Re: Property Path Profiles Andy Seaborne
Service description namespace documents in place Ivan Herman
Re: Property Path Profiles Ivan Herman
Re: HTTP RDF Update review Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm

Monday, 11 January 2010

Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol Luke Wilson-Mawer
Re: Property Path Profiles Matt Perry
Re: my comments on the "Property Paths" document Souri Das
Re: off-topic question on cursors Kendall Clark
Re: off-topic question on cursors Andy Seaborne
RE: off-topic question on cursors Orri Erling
Re: Property Path Profiles Andy Seaborne
Re: Property Path Profiles Matt Perry
Re: Property Path Profiles Ivan Herman
Re: Property Path Profiles Matt Perry
Re: Property Path Profiles Lee Feigenbaum
Property Path Profiles Matt Perry
Re: entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres
Re: entailment review - part 2 Birte Glimm
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Axel Polleres
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Axel Polleres
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Steve Harris
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Steve Harris
Re: my comments on the "Property Paths" document Andy Seaborne
Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) Ivan Herman
my comments on the "Property Paths" document Souripriya Das

Sunday, 10 January 2010

Agenda SPARQL TC 12/01/2010 Axel Polleres
Re: brief review on protocol Lee Feigenbaum

Saturday, 9 January 2010

Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Andy Seaborne
Re: Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) Andy Seaborne
Summary of recent issues on current query spec (to be discussed in detail after current WD round) Axel Polleres
Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 Update Axel Polleres
off-topic question on cursors Axel Polleres
brief review on protocol Axel Polleres
entailment review - part 2 Axel Polleres

Friday, 8 January 2010

Re: FILTER in abbreviated delete Lee Feigenbaum
Re: FILTER in abbreviated delete Steve Harris
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Steve Harris
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Andy Seaborne
Security considerations in SPARQL Update Paul Gearon
FILTER in abbreviated delete Paul Gearon
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Paul Gearon
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Steve Harris
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Paul Gearon
Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs Paul Gearon
Re: [TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates Birte Glimm
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs Steve Harris
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Steve Harris
Re: [TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates Andy Seaborne
Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 7 January 2010

Re: Update on Update Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Update 1.1 Paul Gearon
Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs Paul Gearon
Re: Update on Update Paul Gearon
Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 Ivan Herman
Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" Paul Gearon
[TF-ENT] Informative section added regarding updates Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 Birte Glimm
Minutes of 5th January meeting Alexandre Passant
Applogies Steve Harris

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

Re: SemTech attendees? Kendall Clark
SemTech attendees? Lee Feigenbaum
Re: entailment review - part 1 Axel Polleres
Re: entailment review - part 1 Birte Glimm
Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 Ivan Herman
Re: property paths review Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Lee Feigenbaum
property paths review Lee Feigenbaum
HTTP RDF Update review Lee Feigenbaum
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Steve Harris
Re: brief review for service description document Gregory Williams
service description call tomorrow Gregory Williams
Sparql Protocol 1.1 Review David Charboneau
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Souripriya Das
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Steve Harris

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

Re: entailment review - part 1 Andy Seaborne
Re: entailment review - part 1 Birte Glimm
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Ivan Herman
open comments Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Souri Das
Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 Birte Glimm
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Andy Seaborne
WSDL Conformance and Optional Operations David Charboneau
Service Description 1.1 Review David Charboneau
[public-rdf-dawg] <none> David Charboneau
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Birte Glimm
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Andy Seaborne
entailment review - part 1 Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Souripriya Das
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Axel Polleres
URI-s for OWL 2 profiles and Entailment regimes published Ivan Herman
Apologies Paul Gearon
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Birte Glimm
Re: Query 1.1 Review Andy Seaborne
Re: Query 1.1 Review Matt Perry
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Andy Seaborne
Re: ACTION-brief review of property paths Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Steve Harris
Re: Query 1.1 Review Andy Seaborne
SPARQL Query 1.1 review comments Souripriya Das
brief review for service description document Axel Polleres

Monday, 4 January 2010

ACTION-brief review of property paths Axel Polleres
Query 1.1 Review Matt Perry
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Axel Polleres
Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query 1.1 Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Birte Glimm
Re: Review of Query 1.1 Birte Glimm
Re: Review of Query 1.1 Andy Seaborne
Changes to Query 1.1 Steve Harris
Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD Ivan Herman
Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS Andy Seaborne
Re: [TF-PP] Minor comments on the current document Andy Seaborne
Review of Update 1.1 Axel Polleres
Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-01-05 Axel Polleres

Sunday, 3 January 2010

Re: Review of Query 1.1 Axel Polleres

Saturday, 2 January 2010

Review of Query 1.1 Birte Glimm

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 21:06:12 UTC