- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:23:27 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> * Assignment (Andy ?) Yes - I'll do that one. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum > Sent: 26 March 2009 15:17 > To: SPARQL Working Group > Subject: volunteers for 31-March teleconference > > Hi everyone, > > Here's what's on my list to go after on Tuesday. We might not get to all > of it, of course. I've put suggested volunteers in parentheses -- please > let me know if your name is here and you can't/choose not to present a > feature or if your name is NOT here and you wish to present a feature :- > ) > > We'll start with finishing the topics from last week, and then move back > to an emphasis on query language proposed features. > > > * ExecCommentsAndWarnings (Ivan M. / Orri?) > * Query response linking (Lee, presenting on behalf of Leigh Dodds from > -comments) > * Assignment (Andy ?) > * Accessing lists (Ivan H. ?) > * FunctionLibrary[1] (Lee) > * SurfaceSyntax[1] (Lee) > * FullText (Kjetil? Else Ivan M. or Orri? Else I'm happy to do it) > > [1] Note, for these two, I intend to discuss whether or not we should > include these as work items in general - if we do decide to, I think > it's reasonable to move discussion of the specific functions and/or > surface syntax to be pushed to the mailing list and even pushed to when > we begin our actual specification work. > > As always, please remember that we will not end up discussing all > proposed features on the teleconferences, but all WG members will have > the opportunity to express their opinion on all features via a survey in > 2-3 weeks from now. This means: > > 1) please follow & join in the mailing list discussion for any features > you are concerned about > > 2) please start mailing list discussions of any features that you want - > I'm trying my best to do this with features that I don't expect to be > able to cover in teleconferences, but I can't guarantee completeness :-) > > Lee > >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 15:24:19 UTC