- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:42:54 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
A big NO to "SPARQL 2" from me. Major version numbers imply (to me) incompatible or significantly large change. Andy PS Maybe SPARQL 2010 should have had a ":-)" > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum > Sent: 25 March 2009 15:29 > To: SPARQL Working Group > Subject: Naming - old and new SPARQL > > I'd like to solicit suggestions for what to call SPARQL circa 2008 and > the new work that we are doing, as per Andy's latest email. > > possibilities? > > SPARQL 1 -> SPARQL 2 > SPARQL 1.0 -> SPARQL 1.1 > SPARQL 2008 -> SPARQL 2010 > > Lee
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 15:58:43 UTC