Tuesday, 30 June 2009
- Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT
- Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT
- Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT
- DESCRIBE ENDPOINT
- Re: F&R document
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- F&R document
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
Monday, 29 June 2009
- Re: UNSAID vs MINUS
- RE: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-06-30
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- RE: UNSAID vs MINUS
- RE: UNSAID vs MINUS
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-06-30
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-06-30
- UNSAID vs MINUS
- Comments F&R
Sunday, 28 June 2009
Friday, 26 June 2009
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
Thursday, 25 June 2009
- RE: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- RE: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
- Re: Review of F&R doc
- Re: Review of F&R doc
- Re: Review of F&R doc
- Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R
Wednesday, 24 June 2009
Tuesday, 23 June 2009
- SPARQL WG Minutes from 23 June 2009
- How to do the SPARQL WG minutes
- Introduction
- Re: Review of F&R doc
- regrets
- Links to actuall implementations (Re: Review of F&R doc)
- RE: Review of F&R doc
- Re: Review of F&R doc
- Re: Review of F&R doc
- Review of F&R doc
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tuesday, June 23
Monday, 22 June 2009
Wednesday, 17 June 2009
Tuesday, 16 June 2009
- Exists
- Regrets
- Re: ProjectExpressions examples
- Regrets
- Re: ProjectExpressions without concat
- ProjectExpressions examples
- RE: ProjectExpressions without concat
- Re: Features & rationale shortname
- Re: Features & rationale shortname
- Re: Features & rationale shortname
Monday, 15 June 2009
Tuesday, 16 June 2009
Monday, 15 June 2009
- [ACTION-38] Re: Agenda 2009-06-16
- Re: Agenda 2009-06-16
- ProjectExpressions without concat
- ProjectExpressions without concat
- Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
- [ACTION-36] Some minort change proposal for the introduction
- Re: Agenda 2009-06-16
- Re: Agenda 2009-06-16
- Re: Agenda 2009-06-16
- Re: Agenda 2009-06-16
- RE: Agenda 2009-06-16
- RE: Agenda 2009-06-16
- Agenda 2009-06-16
- Features & rationale shortname
- Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
- RE: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
- Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
- Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
Friday, 12 June 2009
Thursday, 11 June 2009
- Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
- Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
- RE: Some comments on F&R (2)
- Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
- Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
Wednesday, 10 June 2009
- RE: Some comments on F&R (2)
- RE: Some comments on F&R (2)
- Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
- Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
- Some comments on F&R (2)
- Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
Tuesday, 9 June 2009
- SPARQL WG minutes from 2009-06-09
- Re: Some comments on F&R
- [Fwd: Re: F&R freezable?]
- Some comments on F&R
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
Monday, 8 June 2009
Thursday, 4 June 2009
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
- [RESOLVED] Re: SPARQL WG comments on rdf:text
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Requesting input for the Features and Rational document
- Re: SPARQL WG minutes, 2009-06-02
- SPARQL WG minutes, 2009-06-02
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
- Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates
- Re: SPARQL WG agenda, Tues. June 2, 2009
Monday, 1 June 2009
- RE: SPARQL WG agenda, Tues. June 2, 2009
- SPARQL WG agenda, Tues. June 2, 2009
- Re: Data loading cases
Friday, 29 May 2009
Thursday, 28 May 2009
- RE: Implicit vs. Explicit Grouping (Aggregates)
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: Repetitive DELETE, real UPDATE
Wednesday, 27 May 2009
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- RE: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Repetitive DELETE, real UPDATE
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- RE: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- RE: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- RE: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- RE: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- RE: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
Tuesday, 26 May 2009
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues.
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- service descriptions
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- RE: Implicit vs. Explicit Grouping (Aggregates)
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- RE: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- Implicit vs. Explicit Grouping (Aggregates)
Monday, 25 May 2009
- RE: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- RE: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- RE: SPARQL WG telecon agenda: Tues 26-May
- Re: SPARQL WG telecon agenda: Tues 26-May
- Data loading cases
- Move data between graphs
- SPARQL WG telecon agenda: Tues 26-May
Sunday, 24 May 2009
Friday, 22 May 2009
Thursday, 21 May 2009
Tuesday, 19 May 2009
- Correction ISSUE-29
- SPARQL WG minutes, 2009-05-19
- [ACTION-29] Provide Foaf use case on wiki
- RE: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- [ACTION-30] Provide 3 uses cases on wiki
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- [ACTION-27] Ask in DERI about whether RDF Forms/pushback uses WHERE in updates
- Re: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- RE: [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- [ACTION-18] use case on !ASK in FILTERS to emulate negation
- [ACTION-20] a query using CONSTRUCT in the FROM clause.
- Re: Reflections on Update
- SPARQL/Update Use Cases
- Minutes, Day 2 F2F1
- Minutes of Day 1 of F2F1 available
Monday, 18 May 2009
- Re: Reflections on Update
- Re: Audience for the F&R
- Audience for the F&R
- Re: Reflections on Update
- Re: Reflections on Update
- SPARQL WG telecon agenda: Tues 19-May
Friday, 15 May 2009
- RE: Reflections on Update
- Re: Reflections on Update
- Re: Reflections on Update
- RE: Reflections on Update
Wednesday, 13 May 2009
Tuesday, 12 May 2009
- RE: ACTION-24: aggregate functions with multiple answers
- Re: ACTION-24: aggregate functions with multiple answers
Monday, 11 May 2009
- Re: ACTION-24: aggregate functions with multiple answers
- RE: ACTION-24: aggregate functions with multiple answers
- Re: ACTION-24: aggregate functions with multiple answers
- ACTION-24: aggregate functions with multiple answers
- ACTION-26 fill example design template
- ACTION-25 : Design template page
Sunday, 10 May 2009
Saturday, 9 May 2009
Friday, 8 May 2009
- RE: More subquery questions - BASE & PREFIX
- GRAPH { ... } & subqueries Re: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- More subquery questions - BASE & PREFIX
- Reflections on Update
- Advanced warning - no chair available for Tuesday's call, call at-risk
- RE: ProjectExpression andAssignment equivalence
- RE: Reflections on Update
- Re: Reflections on Update
- ProjectExpression andAssignment equivalence
- Reflections on Update
- Re: [snip] subqueries and datasets
- Re: [snip] subqueries and datasets
- Re: [snip] subqueries and datasets
- RE: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- RE: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- Re: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- Re: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- Re: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- SPARQL/Immutable
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
- F2F raw minute logs
Thursday, 7 May 2009
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
Wednesday, 6 May 2009
- SPARQL WG comments on rdf:text
- Re: "OWL" Entailment
- "OWL" Entailment
- RE: rdf:text review
- Re: rdf:text review
- Re: aggregates
- Re: aggregates
- RE: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
- Re: U.S. F2F location
- aggregates
- Re: U.S. F2F location
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- OT: Keysigning in Bristol
- Re: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- RE: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- RE: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: The smaller bites (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- UK F2F Location
- U.S. F2F location
Monday, 4 May 2009
- RE: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: The smaller bites (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- RE: The smaller bites (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- RE: F2F1 agenda
- Re: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- RE: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- The smaller bites (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)
- F2F1 agenda
Sunday, 3 May 2009
Friday, 1 May 2009
- RE: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: negation (was: Question regarding subselect)
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: negation (was: Question regarding subselect)
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: negation (was: Question regarding subselect)
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Question regarding subselect
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: Question regarding subselect
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Errata to SPARQL-QL-TR
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Lee's feature proposal
- RE: Lee's feature proposal
- Re: Question regarding subselect
- Lee's feature proposal
Thursday, 30 April 2009
- Introduction
- Re: Question regarding subselect
- Condorcet graph
- Introduction of myself
- RE: rdf:text review
- Re: Question regarding subselect
- RE: Question regarding subselect
- RE: Question regarding subselect
- Question regarding subselect
- Re: picking our features
- Re: Can results of a WBS be made publicly available once the survey is underway?
Wednesday, 29 April 2009
- Can results of a WBS be made publicly available once the survey is underway?
- Re: picking our features
- Re: picking our features
- Re: picking our features
- RE: rdf:text review
- Re: rdf:text review
- Re: rdf:text review
- RE: rdf:text review
- picking our features
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
- SPARQL WG minutes for April 28, 2009
- Re: Updating the Semantic Web FAQ
- Re: rdf:text review
- Re: Updating the Semantic Web FAQ
- RE: rdf:text review
- Re: rdf:text review
- Re: rdf:text review
- Re: A review of rdf:text from a SPARQL perspective (1st draft)
- Errata to SPARQL-QL-TR
- RE: rdf:text review
- Re: rdf:text review
- RE: rdf:text review
- RE: SPARQL telecon agenda for Apr 25, 2009 - 90 minutes
- rdf:text review
Monday, 27 April 2009
- (Partial) Regrets
- Re: SPARQL telecon agenda for Apr 25, 2009 - 90 minutes
- SPARQL telecon agenda for Apr 25, 2009 - 90 minutes
- Re: Updating the Semantic Web FAQ
- Updating the Semantic Web FAQ
- Regrets
Thursday, 23 April 2009
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
- Editors appointed for SPARQL features & rationale doc: Kjetil Kjernsmo and Alexandre Passant
- A review of rdf:text from a SPARQL perspective (1st draft)
- Re: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
- SPARQL WG - Survey now open - please respond
- SPARQL WG minutes from 21 April
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 21, 2009
- added agenda item: survey (was: SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 21, 2009)
- RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 21, 2009
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 21, 2009
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 21, 2009
- Straw schema for the Algebra
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
Monday, 20 April 2009
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 21, 2009
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: features that won't be on the survey
Sunday, 19 April 2009
Friday, 17 April 2009
- features that won't be on the survey
- RE: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- Re: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- Re: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- RE: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- RE: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- Re: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- Re: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- Re: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- RE: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- Re: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- RE: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- RE: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- Re: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- Re: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
- F2F1/Bristol
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: Formalising DESCRIBEs; the result graph
- [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?
Thursday, 16 April 2009
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- SPARQL WG Survey plan - input desired
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 14, 2009
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
- RE: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: [Pragmas] Pragmas as an extensibility point?
- Minutes from April 14 SPARQL WG teleconference
- RE: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: features for this week's teleconference & plan for April
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- RE: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
Monday, 13 April 2009
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- RE: XML Syntax
- Re: XML Syntax
- Re: XML Syntax
- RE: XML Syntax
- XML Syntax
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- RE: features for this week's teleconference & plan for April
- RE: [Pragmas] Pragmas as an extensibility point?
- RE: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
Sunday, 12 April 2009
Friday, 10 April 2009
- Re: Constructing containers and collections
- Re: [BlankNodeRefs] Questions on blank node refs
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Apr. 14, 2009
- [Pragmas] Pragmas as an extensibility point?
- Constructing containers and collections
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
Thursday, 9 April 2009
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
- SPARQL WG Minutes from 7-Apr
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- Fwd: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- RE: SPARQL telecon agenda - 7-April 2009
Monday, 6 April 2009
- Re: Security Concerns section added to Query_by_reference
- SPARQL telecon agenda - 7-April 2009
- Re: features for this week's teleconference & plan for April
- Re: features for this week's teleconference & plan for April
- Regrets - 2009/04/07
- features for this week's teleconference & plan for April