- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:52:14 -0400
- To: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org, member-query-coord@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20080427025214.GA18575@w3.org>
* Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> [2008-04-26 20:29-0600] > > Gentle DAWGs, > > The Full Text Task Force (a joint task force of the XML Query WG and the > XSL WG) has completed processing all of the comments received during, and > after, the Last Call comment period (see > http://www.w3.org/News/2007#item103) and the Working Groups themselves > have voted to progress the resulting XQuery and XPath Full Text 1.0 spec > to Candidate Recommendation. > > The DAWG is cited as a WG with potential interest in this specification. > I am writing this message to you by way of informing you of changes that > have been made to the Full Text specification since publication of the > Last Call Working Draft. You can find a detailed log of all such changes > at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xpath-full-text-10/html/Overview.html#id-xqft-changelog > but a brief summary might be helpful to you. > > * We clarified the process of tokenization. > > * We significantly re-organized some normative material to associate > related text more closely. > > * We repositioned a prolog extension to the first part of the XQuery > prolog from the second part. > > * We made many editorial changes in improvement of the text, both for > comprehension and to remove ambiguities. > > * We identified Features at Risk and drafted a Conformance clause. > > * We parsed all code used for examples and for the functions describing > the formal semantics of the language, correcting syntax errors as they > were found. Similarly, we made a few revisions to the Full Text XQueryX > schemas and stylesheet, bot for clarity and for correctness. > > We do not believe that any of those changes are likely to invalidate the > review of any group or individual, but we want to offer you the > opportunity to confirm or deny that for your group. From XPath, SPARQL uses these functions: definition of the type <numeric> fn:not(xs:boolean) op:boolean-less-than(boolean, boolean), greater-than op:numeric-unary-plus(numeric), minus op:numeric-equal(numeric, numeric) op:numeric-less-than(numeric, numeric), greater-than op:numeric-multiply(numeric, numeric), divide, add, subtract fn:compare(xs:string, xs:string); including the regexp language op:dateTime-equal(xs:dateTime, xs:dateTime) op:dateTime-less-than(xs:dateTime, xs:dateTime), greater-than constructor functions for boolean, float decimal, double, integer, dateTime and string. From XQuery, we use <type error>, Expression Processing, and lean a bit on Effective Boolean Value None of those appear to have changed either in semantics or in the text needed to describe their invocation. Based on this, I believe that DAWG has no dependencies on this update to XQuery and XPath Full Text. Good luck. > We have planned a Transition Call on Monday, 2008-04-28 at 14:00 Zakim > time, and would appreciate a response as early on that day as possible. > > Hope this helps, > Jim > > ======================================================================== > Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144 > Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; XQX (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345 > Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com > 1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org > Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name > ======================================================================== > = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions = > = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = > = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = > ======================================================================== > -- -eric office: +1.617.258.5741 32-G528, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA mobile: +1.617.599.3509 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2008 02:53:02 UTC