Re: test change proposal: same graph in default and named graph parts of RDF dataset from Lee Feigenbaum on 2007-10-04 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2007)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:59:47 -0400
To: ogbujic@ccf.org
CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <47053823.3090604@thefigtrees.net>

Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> 
> Yes, I agree.  My only concern is that even if we don't have an explicit
> test that exposes this counter-intuitive behavior there (perhaps) should
> be some kind of indication so it is not *completely* out left field.
> Even if we don't add an explicit warning, perhaps leave a test case
> which exercises this anomaly, without any WG approval?

I'd be happy with an unapproved test case. And I'd even be happy with 
(informative) text that alerts the reader to the possible interop 
"gotcha". What do the editors think?

Lee

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:00:05 UTC