W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: test change proposal: same graph in default and named graph parts of RDF dataset

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:59:47 -0400
Message-ID: <47053823.3090604@thefigtrees.net>
To: ogbujic@ccf.org
CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> Yes, I agree.  My only concern is that even if we don't have an explicit
> test that exposes this counter-intuitive behavior there (perhaps) should
> be some kind of indication so it is not *completely* out left field.
> Even if we don't add an explicit warning, perhaps leave a test case
> which exercises this anomaly, without any WG approval?

I'd be happy with an unapproved test case. And I'd even be happy with 
(informative) text that alerts the reader to the possible interop 
"gotcha". What do the editors think?

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:00:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:52 UTC