- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:58:42 -0400
- To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone, Eric is at risk for Tuesday; Orri and Ivan M can't make it, and I have schedule-crunch. We're still doing well towards a decision to move to PR, but I think we might shorten up this Tuesday's teleconf and push the meat of our work to a week from Tuesday. We do have one issue that we need to tackle ASAP: On August 2, we received a comment from Stu Baurmann: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Aug/0005.html The message brings up the possibility of including unescaped XML literal values in the SPARQL Query Results XML Format. Although Richard Newman responded with some technical concerns about the suggestion, the Working Group never responded. We owe Stu a response before publishing a CR version of the XML results format. I'd like to know if there is anyone on the working group who would like to consider this suggestion and propose a design for it. I know that Andy had some technical concerns about it and there are also, of course, schedule concerns, but in the interest of due diligence I wanted to give working group members who might support this comment a chance to speak up. So please register your support or active lack of support on the mailing list if you can, and we'll attempt to dispatch of the comment on Tuesday's teleconference. For Tuesday, I'm picturing taking up this issue and then going over where we stand in terms of advancing all three of our specifications to PR, and seeing who has what actions on the critical path between here and there. I'm hoping to keep the call to 30 minutes. The flip side is that I'm expecting a somewhat lengthy call the week after -- probably on the order of 90 minutes. Please let us know as soon sa you can if you cannot make our call on Oct 2. Lee
Received on Saturday, 22 September 2007 04:58:53 UTC