Re: all facets covered, list of tests to approve:

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> * Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> [2007-08-31 03:09-0400]
>>> Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>>> * Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> [2007-08-17 21:31-0400]
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/facets-coverage#coverage
>>>>>
>>>>> ...shows that the tests under data-r2/* now cover all of the facets 
>>>>> identified by Eric. We've also taken extensive tests from ARQ, a 
>>>>> couple of tests from SteveH, and some tests from Chimezie to cover 
>>>>> more complicated algebraic constructs.
>>>> The coverage report had a mis-informed entry in it 'as the code was
>>>> assuming that all the .rq files were part of the test suite. None of
>>>> the open-world/sameTerm .rqs are parts of tests so this entry was 
>>>> bogus:
>>>> <a href="data-r2/open-world/sameTerm.rq" 
>>>> title="BuiltInCall-sameTerm">1</a>
>>>> The attached diff provides 3 tests for sameTerm. Should I commit it?
>>> Please commit it.
>>>
>>> We've received some feedback about possible errata in the test suite 
>>> that we will look at and rectify on Tuesday's telecon. This is one of 
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Can people (Eric, Andy, Steve, anyone else) please report results on 
>>> running these three tests after Eric commits them? (Eric please write 
>>> when committed.)
>>
>> done. note
>>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/facets-coverage#coverage
>> says "0 facets not covered" and has data-r2/expr-builtin/sameTerm.rq
>> as the canonical for BuiltInCall-sameTerm.
> 
> ARQ runs the expr-builtin manifest successfully
> 

Glitter does as well.

Lee

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 06:59:38 UTC