- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:04:41 -0400
- To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone, Lots to do to get our ducks in a row. See you all tomorrow. Lee 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 28 August 2007 at 14:30:00 UTC + LeeF chairing + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333 + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg + Scribe: @@ + Regrets: + roll call + minutes from last week [2] + next meeting 4 Sep. @@ recruit scribe, regrets? + agenda comments? 1. Review ACTION Items These actions appear DONE: ACTION: LeeF to advertise existence of test materials and solicit implementation reports ACTION: LeeF to generate archive of test materials which includes license Let's check on the status of the following actions: -- misc -- ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings is not defined here ACTION: ericP to answer "EBV of invalid numeric literals" email from Arjohn -- implementation report -- ACTION: EliasT to come up with feature list for protocol testing -- tests -- ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in documentation ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest namespace document -- spec -- ACTION: ericP to incorporate text to fix EBV of illformed numeric literals bug in spec 2. Query language text changes + Anything pending from Last Call comments? + EBV text + What else...? I'd like to line up reviewers for these text changes well in advance of transitioning to PR. 3. SPARQL Query Results XML Format ...I can't find the thread about whether we should put the revised XML format back to CR or transition it directly to PR along with the query language spec. In either case, we should discuss testing of the XML format to demonstrate interoperable implementations. 4. SPARQL Protocol How do we test the protocol: + what features do we look for + how do we define the tests + schedule I've asked Elias to join us since he's worked on this in the past. 5. Test suite and test service and implementation report We've published the test suite and will be publishing the test service shortly. Where should we gather EARL results? Any progress on generating an implementation report? [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0096/21-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 19:05:05 UTC