W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

DAWG Agenda - 28 Aug 2007 @ 14:30 UTC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:04:41 -0400
Message-ID: <46D32049.7070209@thefigtrees.net>
To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Hi everyone,

Lots to do to get our ducks in a row. See you all tomorrow.


0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 28 August 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
          + LeeF chairing
          + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 
tel:+ tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
          + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
          + Scribe: @@
          + Regrets:
          + roll call
          + minutes from last week [2]
          + next meeting 4 Sep. @@ recruit scribe, regrets?
          + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These actions appear DONE:

ACTION: LeeF to advertise existence of test materials and solicit 
implementation reports
ACTION: LeeF to generate archive of test materials which includes license

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

-- misc --

ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types 
(esp. application/sparql-query)
ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter 
and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings 
is not defined here
ACTION: ericP to answer "EBV of invalid numeric literals" email from Arjohn

-- implementation report --

ACTION: EliasT to come up with feature list for protocol testing

-- tests --

ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in 
ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest 
namespace document

-- spec --

ACTION: ericP to incorporate text to fix EBV of illformed numeric 
literals bug in spec

2. Query language text changes

+ Anything pending from Last Call comments?
+ EBV text
+ What else...?

I'd like to line up reviewers for these text changes well in advance of 
transitioning to PR.

3. SPARQL Query Results XML Format

...I can't find the thread about whether we should put the revised XML 
format back to CR or transition it directly to PR along with the query 
language spec.

In either case, we should discuss testing of the XML format to 
demonstrate interoperable implementations.

4. SPARQL Protocol

How do we test the protocol:
   + what features do we look for
   + how do we define the tests
   + schedule

I've asked Elias to join us since he's worked on this in the past.

5. Test suite and test service and implementation report

We've published the test suite and will be publishing the test service 
shortly. Where should we gather EARL results? Any progress on generating 
an implementation report?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 19:05:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:51 UTC