- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:35:32 -0400
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > Some tests for LIMIT/OFFSET > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/solution-seq/ > > All the test involve ORDER BY so that the results are consistent. > Glitter passes all but slice-4 and slice-5. Upon further inspection, these tests (maybe others?) rely on sorting xsd:integer typed literals and plain literals in a consistent manner, which I think we agreed is undefined by the spec? Lee PS Glitter doesn't pass the i18n tests, but I didn't expect that it would - my test harness, at least, isn't setup to handle it well, and I'm not sure if the query engine handles i18n well either.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:35:40 UTC