Re: super manifest vocabulary / structure

Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Is anyone using these currently? I'm guessing not, since the "include" 
> predicate in manifest-evaluation.ttl right now is
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#include
> 
> while in manifest-syntax.ttl it's
> 
>    http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2005/05/test-manifest-extra#include
> 
> I'd like to fix this, but while doing that I'd like to change the object 
> of mf:include from an RDF list to a test manifest URI. (i.e., multiple 
> mf:include triples instead of one list). That will make it easier to 
> query in implementations without some sort of list:member support.
> 
> Any objections to this?

None what so ever - the manifests in data-r2 are changed.

Err - one is (evaluation), one isn't (syntax).

	Andy

> 
> Lee
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England