- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:04:04 -0500
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 6, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > I believe that Andy was responding that "used to show each triple > explicitly" is not meta-commentary, as it is commenting on Turtle > rather > than on SPARQL. I've changed the wording to: > > """ > This document uses the Turtle data format to show each triple > explicitly. > """ This is much clearer. Thanks. > I considered a clause at the end of the parentheticals along the > lines of > ", with the changes from URIs to IRIs noted above", but believe the > section is clearer as is. So it seems settled, then. Fine. >> Ouch. Well, there is a Unicode form for browsers that are broken; I >> wasn't suggesting "–" explicitly as just reminding about the >> conventional orthography, which may be implemented in a few diff >> ways. > > In the interests of time and lacking the resources to thoroughly > audit the > document for ranges and Web browsers for the most supported way to > express > en dashes, I've chosen to ignore this orthographic error. If you > have the > resources to address this, I'd be glad to commit the changes. If W3C doc Q&A doesn't catch this and make us fix it (I don't know if it will or won't, but it's pretty careful, as I recall), then who am I to care? But, FWIW, it's not that complicated to fix: http://alistapart.com/articles/emen/ Cheers, Kendall
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 00:04:20 UTC