- From: Jeen Broekstra <j.broekstra@tue.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:23:35 +0100
- To: DAWG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I have checked in four additional sets of query evaluation test cases in the data-r2 directory: - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/bnode-coreference/ (1 test) - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/bound/ (1 test) - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/ (3 tests) - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/expr-builtin/ (17 tests) The first three test sets are of course rather small, I have yet to explore the existing tests to see if other directories contain tests that we can add to each. Note that in principle these sets distinguish a specific kind of functionality for which they are designed to test. While transforming and executing these tests I ran into a few issues: First, in optional, #dawg-union-001. The test set is about testing optional paths, but this particular test does not contain an optional, instead it tests the UNION operator. Should we perhaps move this particular test to a set specifically about union? In the expr-builtin test set I have made some modifications to the original tests (to be found in data/ExprBuiltins). Several tests (<#dawg-datatype-2>, <#dawg-datatype-3>, <#dawg-lang-1>, <#dawg-lang-2>, <#dawg-lang-3>) used an ORDER BY clause, which is not pertinent to the test (which are about the datatype() and lang() built-in functions). I have removed the order by clause from these tests to avoid that implementations fail these tests "for the wrong reasons". As far as I have been able to determine, all these tests are up to date with the current query spec. Additional eyeballs are invited to correct :) Cheers, Jeen -- Dr. Jeen Broekstra Den Dolech 2 Information Systems Group HG 7.76 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science P.O. Box 513 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 5600 MB Eindhoven tel. +31 (0)40 247 36 86 The Netherlands
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 11:23:57 UTC