- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Lee Feigenbaum wrote on 02/08/2007 04:06:08 PM: > > Hi everyone, > > Re: ACTION: Lee to adapt text from 4.1.1 to specify how the protocol can > contribute to the base IRI for query evaluation as per #relIRIs in the QL > spec > > At the end of this week's teleconference, Eric and I discussed whether the > protocol specification should discuss how it contributes to determination > of the base IRI used for resolving relative IRIs when parsing/executing a > SPARQL query. > > Currently, rq25 already contains this text in 4.1.1 Syntax for IRIs > > Relative IRIs: > > """ > The BASE keyword defines the Base IRI used to resolve relative IRIs per > RFC3986 section 5.1.1, "Base URI Embedded in Content". Section 5.1.2, > "Base URI from the Encapsulating Entity" defines how the Base IRI may come > from an encapsulating document, such as a SOAP envelope with an xml:base > directive, or a mime multipart document with a Content-Location header. > The "Retrieval URI" identified in 5.1.3, Base "URI from the Retrieval > URI", is the URL from which a particular SPARQL query was retrieved. If > none of the above specifies the Base URI, the default Base URI (section > 5.1.4, "Default Base URI") is used. > """ > > (Aside: Eric, can you add in the anchor point here that we discussed? > #relIRIs) > > I took a stab at editing the protocol document (not yet checked into CVS) > and came up with something almost identical but a bit different: > > """ > Determining the Base IRI > > Relative IRIs that appear in a [SPARQL] query are resolved against a base > IRI as per [RFC3986] section 5.1, "Establishing a Base URI". If present in > the query, the BASE keyword defines the Base IRI used to resolve relative > IRIs per RFC3986 section 5.1.1, "Base URI Embedded in Content". Otherwise, > Section 5.1.2, "Base URI from the Encapsulating Entity", defines how the > Base IRI may come from an encapsulating document, such as a SOAP envelope > with an xml:base directive. (See 2.3 SOAP Envelope. Otherwise, the > "Retrieval URI" identified in 5.1.3, Base "URI from the Retrieval URI", is > the URL of the SPARQL protocol service implementing the SparqlQuery > interface. If none of the above specifies the Base URI, the default Base > URI (section 5.1.4, "Default Base URI") is used. > """ Following the discussion with Andy, I'll suggest replacing the sentence which begins "Otherwise, the "Retrieval URI"..." with: """ Otherwise, the "Retrieval URI" identified in 5.1.3, Base "URI from the Retrieval URI", is the complete URL used to send a particular SPARQL query to a SPARQL protocol service implementing the SparqlQuery interface. """ If we agree on this (or related) text, I think that the query language specification should also be updated accordingly. Eric? Lee > In particular, note the difference in how to intepret 5.1.3 of RFC3986 - > the query spec. talks about the "retrieval URI" as "the URL from which a > particular SPARQL query was retrieved" whereas (following the discussion > with EricP) whereas the text I came up with for the protocol spec says > that the "retrieval URI" corresponds to the URL of the SPARQL service > endpoint. I'm not sure which is more correct (if either), but I am pretty > sure that the two documents should agree on their recommendation for > interpreting RFC3986 5.1.3. > > thoughts? > > Lee > >
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2007 19:14:58 UTC