- From: Fred Zemke <fred.zemke@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:01:04 -0800
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
In Perez et.al. "Semantics of SPARQL" Definition 3.9 item (3) second dashed bullet, I think it is saying that the value of a graph selector variable in a GRAPH pattern does not need to be in the scoping set; rather, it needs to be among the names of named graphs. I agree with this position. For example SELECT ?g FROM NAMED <g1> FROM NAMED <g2> SELECT { GRAPH ?g { 'Tom' <loves> 'Mary' } } the query asks which graphs know that Tom loves Mary. I do not believe there is any requirement for the value of ?g to be in the scoping set, that is, the RDF terms of the default graph, which in this particular query will default to some system default graph. I see no reason to demand that ?g must be mapped to some term in the default RDF graph. I see no reason to expect that the default RDF graph is even aware of the two named graphs <g1> and <g2>. Of course if ?g was also constrained by appearing in some basic graph pattern, then the constraints on pattern matching the BGP would also come into play and ?g would need to match a term of the graph in which the BGP is evaluated. Fred
Received on Friday, 10 November 2006 19:02:01 UTC