- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:46:07 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 17 Oct 2006, at 11:42, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:45:33PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> >> """ >> ACTION AndyS: >> Write some tests for value testing (unknown types and >> extensibility) to add >> to >> 2006/JulSep0086 >> """ >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0086 >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0104 >> >> I added some tests and sorted out the existing ones. They are >> split into >> sets >> so can be considered separately if desired. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/OpenWorld/ >> >> Tests open-eq-01 to open-eq-06 are the original ones from >> 2006AprJun/0104, >> renamed. > > I agree with these tests. These require no extension to SPARQL. > | "open-eq-01"|"passed"| "001"^^xsd:integer !≘ "01"^^xsd:integer > | "open-eq-02"|"passed"| "a"^^t:type1 ≘ "a"^^t:type1 > | "open-eq-03"|"passed"| 1 = 1, "01"^^xsd:integer = 1 > | "open-eq-04"|"passed"| 2 != 1, "02"^^xsd:integer != 1 > | "open-eq-05"|"passed"| "a"^^t:type1 = "a"^^t:type1 > | "open-eq-06"|"passed"| ∅ != "a"^^t:type1 > > I propose that the WG approve these tests. I don't have xsd:date support, so don't pass the xsd:date tests, but the others I agree with. - Steve
Received on Monday, 23 October 2006 12:46:21 UTC