- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:45:17 +0100
- To: "Fred Zemke" <fred.zemke@oracle.com>
- Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Fred, The design message I metioned was: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0145 An explicit assigment might be the best long term approach if it is also available in the main part of the query, otherwise a syntax that is specific to the SELECT clause seems more appropriate. To be compatible with the results format as it stands, there needs to be a variable name - that could change to a more general label - but just positional does not work because the XML results format omits unbound variables, not record them explicitly. - - - - - - What was the issue for SQL with ambiguity that you worked on? Was it syntactic ambiguity or an interpretion/associativity ambiguity? Andy
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:45:34 UTC