- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:29:07 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote: >> Test cases are: >> 1/ A deliverable we are chartered to provide >> 2/ A good way of making sure we are talking about the same thing. > > Sure, but I think progress on the semantics of the algebra are > achievable even without test cases, or with tests cases that might have > to be updated (just as they were with distinct). No tests changed or were updated for DISTINCT. We've gone back to the Nov 2005 text (which I stupidly lost) and clarified that two functions have the same mapping - solutions map to RDF terms. Which is function equality without function names. I added one DISTINCT test but it's not approved. find . -name \*rq | xargs grep -l -i distinct | xargs ls -l -rwxr-xr-x 1 Andy None 129 Sep 25 11:09 ./Distinct/distinct-1.rq -rwxr-xr-x 1 Andy None 79 Mar 22 2006 ./SolutionSeq/q-seq-02.rq -rwxr-xr-x 1 Andy None 92 Mar 22 2006 ./SolutionSeq/q-seq-04.rq -rwxr-xr-x 1 Andy None 107 Mar 22 2006 ./SolutionSeq/q-seq-09.rq -rwxr-xr-x 1 Andy None 112 Mar 23 2006 ./extracted-examples/query-10.1.2.rq -rwxr-xr-x 1 Andy None 96 Aug 21 2005 ./survey/query-survey-10.rq Maybe you meant datatype/lang. The fixes were unrelated to discussion at that point and date from much further back. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0169 Andy
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 11:29:46 UTC