Friday, 29 September 2006
Thursday, 28 September 2006
Wednesday, 27 September 2006
Monday, 25 September 2006
- Re: regrets
- Re: regrets
- regrets
- Re: DISTINCTness of literals
- Re: DISTINCTness of literals
- Re: ISSUE: rule [14] SolutionModifier
- DISTINCTness of literals
Friday, 22 September 2006
- ISSUE: domain of solutions
- ISSUE: duplicates from UNION
- ISSUE: entailment and general framework
- ISSUE: rule [14] SolutionModifier
Thursday, 21 September 2006
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- Re: rq24 ready for publication
- rq24 ready for publication
- Fw: A question about the OPTIONAL pattern
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
Tuesday, 19 September 2006
- Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
- Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
- illustrate basic graph matching conflicts
- Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
- Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
- Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
- Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
Monday, 18 September 2006
- test cases for FILTER scope and order, take 2
- Re: test cases for FILTER scope and order
- 12 sept minutes
- Re: test cases for FILTER scope and order
- Re: more on earl
- Re: agenda, 19 Sept, 14:30 UTC
- Re: earl
Sunday, 17 September 2006
Saturday, 16 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Thursday, 14 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Thursday, 14 September 2006
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
- Re: order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs?
- Re: Comments on rq24 reorganization
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND issues#unsaid, nestedOptional
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
- Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC
- Re: Summary of my comments: close many, please add some to issue list
- Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC
- Re: [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 2)
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 3)
- Re: Summary of my comments: close many, please add some to issue list
- [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24
- [NEW ISSUE?] NAF & !BOUND
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
Monday, 11 September 2006
- Re: agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC - possible regrets
- agenda, 12 Sept, 14:30 UTC
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
- CSS problems with rq24
- Re: Complexity of nested optionals
- Re: Complexity of nested optionals
Friday, 8 September 2006
Thursday, 7 September 2006
Wednesday, 6 September 2006
- minutes Sep 5
- Re: [TO ADVANCE] formsOfDistinct
- Re: Complexity of nested optionals
- Complexity of nested optionals
- [TO ADVANCE] formsOfDistinct
- [TO SETTLE] nonliteralValueTesting
- [NEW ISSUE] Indicating D-entailment
- [TO SETTLE] contradictoryKB
Tuesday, 5 September 2006
- regrets for 12 Sep Re: agenda, 5 sept 14:30 UTC
- Fw: Comments on rq24 reorganization
- Re: agenda, 5 sept 14:30 UTC
Monday, 4 September 2006
Tuesday, 29 August 2006
- RDF Data Access 29 Aug minutes for review
- ISSUE: BNode scope through UNION (and other algebraic operations)
- Re: agenda, 29 August, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, late
Monday, 28 August 2006
- agenda, 29 August, 14:30 UTC
- 22 August minutes
- order of FILTERs in a BGP? scope of FILTERs?
- regrets 29 Aug
- agenda, late
- SPARQL Tutorial
Friday, 25 August 2006
- Fwd: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
- Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
Thursday, 24 August 2006
- Open world value tests
- Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
Tuesday, 22 August 2006
- Re: GRAPH details and test cases
- Re: GRAPH details and test cases
- Re: trade-offs for equivalence tests
- Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query
- Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query
- Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: Bnodes and the RDF graph syntax (part 1).
- Some datatype() and lang() tests
- Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query
- trade-offs for equivalence tests
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]]
- Re: Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL
Monday, 21 August 2006
- Re: agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query
- agenda, 22 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Zakim difficulties, 21 Aug
- Re: Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]]
- [Fwd: Re: Determining whether '<' is a beginning of IRI or 'less than' operator [OK?]]
- Re: Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL
- Re: adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query
- Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
- Re: ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
Sunday, 20 August 2006
- Bnodes and the RDF graph syntax (part 1).
- Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
Saturday, 19 August 2006
- ACTION item(s): definition(s) and an algorithm for postprocessing minimization
- Re: One semi-historical point (was Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified)
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals)
- Re: The Mary example (Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment))
- Re: One semi-historical point (was Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified)
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
Friday, 18 August 2006
- Constructive mapping semantics for SPARQL
- Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
- The SameAs bit (was Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment))
- Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals)
- Editorial: consistent use of "triple" instead of "arc"
- Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals)
Thursday, 17 August 2006
- The Mary example (Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment))
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: GRAPH details and test cases
- One semi-historical point (was Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified)
- Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
- Re: GRAPH details and test cases
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
- Re: ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals)
- Re: Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
Wednesday, 16 August 2006
- ISSUE: Malformed literals and non-lexical literals
- Re: GRAPH details and test cases
- ISSUE: Inconsistent graphs (and illformed literals)
- Summary of BNode redundancy options (at the moment)
- Meeting minutes 15 August 2006
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
Tuesday, 15 August 2006
- Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
- Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
- adding dawg:monotonicity and extensible data types to SPARQL query
- Re: Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
- Re: telcon agenda, 15 August 14:30 UTC
- Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 3)
- Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 2)
- Review of "rq24" reorg. of SPARQL Query Language for RDF (part 1)
Monday, 14 August 2006
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
- telcon agenda, 15 August 14:30 UTC
- Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
- Re: Weird value testing situations
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Re: Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
- Meeting minutes 8 August 2006
- Re: Weird value testing situations
- Re: ISSUE: DISTINCT is underspecified
- Weird value testing situations
- Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
Sunday, 13 August 2006
Saturday, 12 August 2006
Friday, 11 August 2006
- Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
- Re: Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
- Semantics necessary not sufficient (was: Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?)
Thursday, 10 August 2006
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
Wednesday, 9 August 2006
Tuesday, 8 August 2006
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: my action item
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
Monday, 7 August 2006
- What is "the serious bug in entailment semantics" found by J. Perez"?
- Re: A neat, but impractical, solution
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: A neat, but impractical, solution
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: my action item
- Re: my action item
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
- Re: A neat, but impractical, solution
- Re: A neat, but impractical, solution
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- agenda, 8 August 2006, 14:30 UTC
Saturday, 5 August 2006
Friday, 4 August 2006
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Meeting Minutes Aug 01
- Re: my action item
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- [Fwd: { } and OPTIONAL]
- Re: bnodes as answer bindings
- Re: my action item
Thursday, 3 August 2006
Wednesday, 2 August 2006
Tuesday, 1 August 2006
- bnodes as answer bindings
- my action item
- Re: ready to exit CR?
- Re: agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC
- Re: agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC
Monday, 31 July 2006
- ready to exit CR?
- Re: agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC
- agenda, 1 August 2006, 14:30UTC
- Re: agenda delayed
- Re: agenda delayed
- Re: agenda delayed
- agenda delayed
- Re: Reposting my paper on constructive formal semantics
Friday, 28 July 2006
Tuesday, 25 July 2006
Monday, 24 July 2006
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Comments on 9 "Specifying RDF datasets" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
- Re: Comments on 2.6 "Multiple Matches" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
- Re: Comments on 10.1 "Solution sequences and result forms" (CR 6 Apr 2006)
- Re: Comments on 2.1.4 "Syntax for blank nodes" in 6 April 2006 CR
Wednesday, 19 July 2006
Monday, 17 July 2006
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (ooooops 3)
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (ooooops 2)
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses (oops)
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
Sunday, 16 July 2006
Friday, 14 July 2006
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
Thursday, 13 July 2006
Wednesday, 12 July 2006
Monday, 10 July 2006
Thursday, 6 July 2006
- Re: Concrete vs. existential semantics
- Re: Concrete vs. existential semantics
- Concrete vs. existential semantics
Wednesday, 5 July 2006
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses
- rq23 -> rq24
- Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses