Thursday, 31 March 2005
- Re: Issue on bound() test?
- Re: Issue on bound() test?
- Issue on bound() test?
- Re: comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery
- Re: comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery
Wednesday, 30 March 2005
Tuesday, 29 March 2005
- An observation that might be useful...
- minutes RDF Data Access 29 Mar for review
- Re: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
- Re: agenda+ on XML serialization (was Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed))
- Re: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- agenda+ on XML serialization (was Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed))
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)
- privacy hook [was: agenda...]
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)
- Regrets for tomorrow
Monday, 28 March 2005
Sunday, 27 March 2005
- RE: solution/variable bindings (was Re: pls consider comments on disjunction)
- Re: solution/variable bindings (was Re: pls consider comments on disjunction)
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
Saturday, 26 March 2005
Friday, 25 March 2005
- [Fwd: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access?]
- Use Cases and Requirements released [was: delayed]
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- release of Use Cases/Requirements delayed
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: construct *
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Regrets for 29th March
Thursday, 24 March 2005
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- FYI: XQuery Update Facility Requirements 1st WD 11 Feb 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (timezone FIX!)
- agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (tentative)
- Re: UC&R updated (WD candidate)
- scribe volunteer for 29 Mar, please?
- pls consider comments on disjunction
- Review of Sort Design
- Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS
- Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS
- Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS
- Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS
- Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS
- Re: on Reification Semantics
- Re: SPARQL v1.264 typos and a few comments
- Re: Minor format change
- Regrets for dawg telcon 2005-04-29
- Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS
- MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Minor format change
- Re: what about RDF format?
- Re: what about RDF format?
- RE: Data binding resource
Wednesday, 23 March 2005
- Re: Data binding resource
- Re: Data binding resource
- Data binding resource
- sparlx.rnc in CVS
- RE: ACTION on xsi:type recommendation for variable binding results
- Re: UC&R updated
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: Use cases for XML serialization
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: ACTION on xsi:type recommendation for variable binding results
- UC&R updated
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: sparqlx
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: what about RDF format?
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: what about RDF format?
- Graph/data model specification
- Re: Use cases for XML serialization
- Re: what about RDF format?
- Re: sparqlx
- Re: modulo operator dropped from editor's draft?
- SPARQL v1.264 typos and a few comments
Tuesday, 22 March 2005
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: sparqlx
- RE: Use cases for XML serialization
- RE: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- on Reification Semantics
- what about RDF format?
- variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- RE: Use cases for XML serialization
- Re: Use cases for XML serialization
- RE: Use cases for XML serialization
- Re: sparqlx
- Use cases for XML serialization
- Re: why is where keyword optional?
- Re: why is where keyword optional?
- Re: Comments list comments
- Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Re: Comments list comments
- "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol
- why is where keyword optional?
- sparqlx
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar
- Re: how does select/project work with extra variables?
- Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Re: Comments list comments
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: how does select/project work with extra variables?
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- RE: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
Monday, 21 March 2005
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- how does select/project work with extra variables?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- SPARQL Abstract Syntax
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- UC&R updated
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- references, acknowledgements
- sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
- Re: UC&R updated
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: UC&R updated
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- UC&R updated
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar
- Re: GROUP BY [was: Comments list comments]
- Re: SELECT to involve expressions [was: Comments list comments]
- GROUP BY [was: Comments list comments]
- SELECT to involve expressions [was: Comments list comments]
- Comments list comments
- modulo operator dropped from editor's draft?
- Re: Update on ORDERing solutions
- Re: Update on ORDERing solutions
- Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format
Sunday, 20 March 2005
- Re: ACTION: propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple
- ACTION: propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple
- ACTION: propose a test based on dawg-triple-pattern-002 with a . in a qname
Saturday, 19 March 2005
Friday, 18 March 2005
- Minutes RDF DAWG telecon 2005-03-15 for review
- minutes RDF Data Access 15 Mar ... IRC log enough?
- Update on ORDERing solutions
Thursday, 17 March 2005
- protocol update delayed
- Re: BaseDecl and PrefixDecl?
- Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- RE: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requir ement
- BaseDecl and PrefixDecl?
Wednesday, 16 March 2005
- Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requir ement
- Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- RE: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
- RE: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- Re: XML serialization of SPARQL
- XML serialization of SPARQL
Tuesday, 15 March 2005
- RE: Casting a literal to a typed literal?
- Example in section 11.3 - prefix not declared, fails to use "&" f or function call.
- 11.2.1.8 sop:datatype uses non-xsd "integer" type.
- Re: Casting a literal to a typed literal?
- foaf prefix not declared in example from section 11.2.1.4 sop:isB lank
- Casting a literal to a typed literal?
- Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
- RE: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
- Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
- Re: Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3?
- Re: Syntax error in example from Section 8.3 of 17 Feb 05 Working Dra ft?
- Example in 10.4 is not valid per 17Feb05 grammar.
- CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
- Re: Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3?
- Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3?
- Syntax error in example from Section 8.3 of 17 Feb 05 Working Dra ft?
- Re: protocol doc changed...
- Re: protocol doc changed...
- Re: protocol doc changed...
- Re: protocol doc changed...
- Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review
- ACTION on xsi:type recommendation for variable binding results
Monday, 14 March 2005
- scribe for tomorrow?
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar
- agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar
- Re: Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests
- Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
- Re: Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests
Friday, 11 March 2005
- Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests
- Re: Working Draft feedback items
- Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
- Re: Working Draft feedback items
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: rq23 update with latest syntax
- Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
- Re: Working Draft feedback items
- Re: rq23 update with latest syntax
- Re: rq23 update with latest syntax
- RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review
Thursday, 10 March 2005
- Minutes of 2005-03-08 Telecon for review
- protocol doc changed...
- Re: Working Draft feedback items
- Re: Working Draft feedback items
- rq23 update with latest syntax
- Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
Wednesday, 9 March 2005
- Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- RE: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTL R.
- Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
Tuesday, 8 March 2005
- N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- [kendall@monkeyfist.com: Re: CONSTRUCT *]
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: ACTION: review "11 Testing Values"
- Re: regrets for 8march telcon
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
Monday, 7 March 2005
- regrets for 8march telcon
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session
- ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- regrets (was Re: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress))
- RE: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress)
- RE: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress)
- RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda
- Re: notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session
- Re: Working Draft feedback items
- RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress)
- Re: CONSTRUCT *
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
Sunday, 6 March 2005
- Working Draft feedback items
- Re: CONSTRUCT *
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session
- Re: CONSTRUCT *
- CONSTRUCT *
Saturday, 5 March 2005
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
Friday, 4 March 2005
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes in progress: actions
- RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes in progress: actions
Thursday, 3 March 2005
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- SPARQL syntax proposals
- BOUND case-sensitivity
Tuesday, 1 March 2005
Monday, 28 February 2005
Sunday, 27 February 2005
Saturday, 26 February 2005
- protocol draft updated
- Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005
- Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005
- Introduction: Bijan Parsia
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
- Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
Friday, 25 February 2005
Thursday, 24 February 2005
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
- preparing for protocol discussion
- Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/
- WSDL2.0 for SPARQL Protocol
- OPTIONALs and constraints
Wednesday, 23 February 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-02-22 for review
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures)
Tuesday, 22 February 2005
- Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/
- Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Cambridge teleconference times)
- FTF hosting offer for June 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs)
Monday, 21 February 2005
- Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: on log:definitiveService
- Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
- Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
- Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
- agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs)
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: sparqlParam: an approach to QL selection/migration
- Re: on log:definitiveService
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures)
- Re: Value testing: implementing str()
Sunday, 20 February 2005
- Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
- Problems with WITH and FROM
- Values: general testing
- Re: Value testing: implementing str()
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures)
- Re: Value testing: implementing str()
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs)
- Value testing: implementing str()
- Re: a service description approach to accessingCollections
Saturday, 19 February 2005
Friday, 18 February 2005
- a service description approach to accessingCollections
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
- sparqlParam: an approach to QL selection/migration
- Re: on log:definitiveService
- SPARQL-Q published
- RE: ftf5 attendance/regrets, WG membership standing
- ftf5 attendance/regrets, WG membership standing
- Re: Tests for expressions : boolean effective values
Thursday, 17 February 2005
- RE: Tests for expressions : boolean effective values
- biblio/references
- Tests for expressions : boolean effective values
Wednesday, 16 February 2005
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Updated rasqal SPARQL demo
- Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]
- Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]
- Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]
- pls don't refer to DAWG in sparql abstract
- Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]
- Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]
- Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]
- Re: ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review]
- Re: ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review]
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review]
Tuesday, 15 February 2005
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Warnings in SPARQL variable bindings results
- Re: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Feb-1 Mar in Camridge, MA, USA (in progress)
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: ACTION: review "11 Testing Values"
- Re: ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service
- Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service
- Re: presentation about DAWG
- publication appointment
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
Monday, 14 February 2005
- ACTION: review "11 Testing Values"
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Feb
- on log:definitiveService
- SPARQL and WSDL
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
Sunday, 13 February 2005
Friday, 11 February 2005
- Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Review of RQ23 section 11, Testing Values
- Re: question about combining patterns
Thursday, 10 February 2005
Wednesday, 9 February 2005
- Review of RQ23 section 11, Testing Values
- ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service
- finding stable OPTIONAL query results [Was: question about combining patterns]
Tuesday, 8 February 2005
Monday, 7 February 2005
- sparql puncutation [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb]
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb
- Re: Resignation from DAWG
- agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb
- Re: Regrets
- Regrets
- Revised souce-named/untrusted-graph*.rq tests
- Re: minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (please review)
Friday, 4 February 2005
Thursday, 3 February 2005
- Optionals and execution order
- Re: question about combining patterns
- RE: question about combining patterns
- RE: LOAD, FROM, GRAPH
Wednesday, 2 February 2005
- Re: minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (please review)
- RE: question about combining patterns
- question about combining patterns
- Re: BOUND test case
- Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
- Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
- Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
- Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
- Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
Tuesday, 1 February 2005
- Resignation from DAWG
- Re: BOUND test case
- Re: Definition of "RDF dataset"
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-02-01 for review
- collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
- Re: Definition of "RDF dataset"
- regrets
- BOUND test case
- Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
- Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
Monday, 31 January 2005
- Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
- agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Feb
- accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
- regrets
- scribe for tomorrow, please?
- F2F hosting offer for May 2005
- XML Schema Datatypes and the Semantic Web
Friday, 28 January 2005
Thursday, 27 January 2005
Wednesday, 26 January 2005
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd)
- Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd)
- Re: about OPTIONAL blocks
- Re: nested SOURCE graph-patterns
- Re: any SOURCE * query example/test-case?
- Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd)
- Re: Successive Bindings, cascaded queries in Algae2
- Re: binary RDF
- about OPTIONAL blocks
- binary RDF
- please registere for the Tech Plenary
Tuesday, 25 January 2005
- minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (in progress; fun with actions)
- Re: about the CONSTRUCT productions
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- nested SOURCE graph-patterns
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
Monday, 24 January 2005
- Re: some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design
- Re: some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design
- any SOURCE * query example/test-case?
- cancelling 25 Jan telcon (RDF Data Access non-agenda)
- about the CONSTRUCT productions
Saturday, 22 January 2005
Thursday, 20 January 2005
Wednesday, 19 January 2005
- comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005
- some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design
- Re: rdql and n3 graphPatterns
- Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp)
- Successive Bindings, cascaded queries in Algae2
Monday, 17 January 2005
- rdql and n3 graphPatterns
- Fwd: proposal to drop DESCRIBE from SPARQL
- [Fwd: flexible SPARQL reification construct instead of hard-wired SOURCE keyword]
- Re: SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times
Sunday, 16 January 2005
- Re: SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times
- Re: SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times
Saturday, 15 January 2005
- SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times
- Re: issues poll: please partcipate! [was: more positions?]
Friday, 14 January 2005
Tuesday, 11 January 2005
- Minutes of 2005-01-11 for review
- Re: presentation about DAWG
- presentation about DAWG
- ftf4 version of protocol spec
- Re: Tests dawg-opt-query-001 dawg-opt-query-002 and dawg-opt-query-003
- Call for Exclusions for "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Tests dawg-opt-query-001 dawg-opt-query-002 and dawg-opt-query-003
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 11 Jan
Monday, 10 January 2005
Saturday, 8 January 2005
Friday, 7 January 2005
Thursday, 6 January 2005
Wednesday, 5 January 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access meeting 19-20 Jan near Helsinki (running late)
- pls share hotel/flight updates
- agenda: RDF Data Access meeting 19-20 Jan near Helsinki (running late)