Thursday, 30 June 2005
- Re: minutes: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Jun
- Re: rq23 v1.409
- minutes: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Jun
- Re: rq23 v1.409
- rq23 v1.409
Wednesday, 29 June 2005
Tuesday, 28 June 2005
- Re: WSDL implications
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
- WSDL implications
- RE: Refining Optionals
- Review: Query Result Form --> need COUNT ?
- Re: propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Jun
- Re: propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE
- Re: propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE
- IRI normalization
- Re: propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE
- Re: propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE
- Re: Refining Optionals
Monday, 27 June 2005
- propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE
- Re: solution modifiers & construct/describe
- Re: Refining Optionals
- Re: solution modifiers & construct/describe
- agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Jun
- Re: solution modifiers & construct/describe
- Re: solution modifiers & construct/describe
- Re: Refining Optionals
- Re: solution modifiers & construct/describe
- Re: solution modifiers & construct/describe
- Implementation Report: SPARQL/P
- Refining Optionals
Friday, 24 June 2005
- Re: giving some serious thought to namespace names (wsdlAbstractProtocol)
- a little fun with the issues list
Thursday, 23 June 2005
- Minutes of RDF Data Access 14 Jun 2005 telcon (for review)
- minutes: RDF Data Access 7 Jun (for review)
Wednesday, 22 June 2005
Monday, 20 June 2005
Friday, 17 June 2005
- Update to defns for Dataset matching
- Re: '.' in (but not ending) a QName
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
Thursday, 16 June 2005
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
- Re: '.' in (but not ending) a QName
- Re: '.' in (but not ending) a QName
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
- Re: Grammar question re: ASK
Wednesday, 15 June 2005
- '.' in (but not ending) a QName
- Grammar question re: ASK
- Re: 'FILTER' '(' Expression ')'
- Re: 'FILTER' '(' Expression ')'
- Re: 'FILTER' '(' Expression ')'
Tuesday, 14 June 2005
- sop:isBound or sop:bound
- RE: Review: Minor typo in sec 10.1 (under OFFSET heading) rq23 1.394
- Review: Minor typo in sec 10.1 (under OFFSET heading) rq23 1.394
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun
- Last Call duration and timing : (was: Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun)
- F2F6 offer : (was: Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun)
Monday, 13 June 2005
- Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun
- RE: editorial comments sec 2.6 - 2.8
- Re: Review: Typo - Section 9.3
- Re: Review. Error - Section 9.3 Missing BASE?
- Re: Restructure definition of Basic Graph Pattern and pattern match (sec 2.4)
- Re: sparql language editorial comments section 2.1-2.5
- Re: Review. Error - Section 10.1 ORDER BY examples dont match grammar
- Re: review of rq23 1.377
- Re: Review. Comment - Section 2.5 bnode results
- Re: Review. Clarification - Section 2.1 result forms
- Re: Review. Comment - Section 2.1 canonical query form
- Re: review of rq23 1.377
- Re: review of rq23 1.377
- Regrets for June 14th teleconf
- Re: Review. Section 11.1.1 Error in promotion/type pecification?
- Re: Review. Section 11.1.1 Error in promotion/type pecification?
Sunday, 12 June 2005
Friday, 10 June 2005
- Re: Updated definitions (constraint)
- Re: review of rq23 1.377
- Re: review of rq23 1.377
- Reviewers comments : thanks!
- Re: Restructure definition of Basic Graph Pattern and pattern match (sec 2.4)
Thursday, 9 June 2005
- giving some serious thought to namespace names (wsdlAbstractProtocol)
- Re: Restructure definition of Basic Graph Pattern and pattern match (sec 2.4)
- Review. Error - Section 10.1 ORDER BY examples dont match grammar
- Review. Section 11.1.1 Error in promotion/type pecification?
- editorial comments sec 2.6 - 2.8
- Review: Typo - Section 9.3
- Review. Error - Section 9.3 Missing BASE?
- review of rq23 1.377
- Restructure definition of Basic Graph Pattern and pattern match (sec 2.4)
- sparql language editorial comments section 2.1-2.5
- Re: Review. Comment - Section 2.5 bnode results
- Review. Comment - Section 2.5 bnode results
- Review. Clarification - Section 2.1 result forms
- Review. Comment - Section 2.1 canonical query form
- Re: toward last call for SPARQL QL
- Re: Definition: Solution Sequence Modifier
Wednesday, 8 June 2005
- Re: toward last call for SPARQL QL
- Re: toward last call for SPARQL QL
- toward last call for SPARQL QL
- Re: 'FILTER' '(' Expression ')'
- separate interfaces/operations for CONSTRUCT and SELECT
Tuesday, 7 June 2005
- Definition: Solution Sequence Modifier
- 'FILTER' '(' Expression ')'
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun
- on str() and uri() and useMentionOp
- separate bindings and graph operations wsdlAbstractProtocol
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun
Monday, 6 June 2005
- agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun
- chair at risk for 14 Jun, 21 Jun teleconferences
- scribe for tomorrow 7 Jun?
- Re: casting support
- RE: import functions and operators from MathML rather than XPath/XQuery? (valueTesting)
- Re: URI/IRI concrete and abstract syntax
- Re: import functions and operators from MathML rather than XPath/XQuery? (valueTesting)
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- casting support
Saturday, 4 June 2005
Friday, 3 June 2005
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: non-empty default graphs
- Re: non-empty default graphs
Thursday, 2 June 2005
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: non-empty default graphs
- chapters 7, 8 and 9 reworded for option (2) Source
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: non-empty default graphs
- Slightly different approach to rq23-like features
- Re: non-empty default graphs
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- import functions and operators from MathML rather than XPath/XQuery? (valueTesting)
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- non-empty default graphs
- Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- RE: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: Q about 05-algae-graphs
Wednesday, 1 June 2005
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Q about 05-algae-graphs
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: possible syntax changes
Tuesday, 31 May 2005
- formatted references in SPARQL QL spec
- Minutes: RDF Data Access 31 May 2005
- Re: possible syntax changes
- Proposal from the telecon 2005-05-31
- Re: possible syntax changes
- Re: test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- test cases for fromUnionQuery, please
- Re: Syntax issues from #swig
- Syntax issues from #swig
- regrets
- possible syntax changes
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 31 May
Monday, 30 May 2005
Friday, 27 May 2005
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on ORDER BY]
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on ORDER BY]
- Re: punctuationSyntax [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May]
Thursday, 26 May 2005
Wednesday, 25 May 2005
Tuesday, 24 May 2005
- regrets
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May
- punctuationSyntax [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May]
- LC timescale [Was: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May]
- regrets for today
Monday, 23 May 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May
- Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on XML Schema 1.0 User Experiences
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May
- agenda: RDF Data Access 24 May
Thursday, 19 May 2005
Wednesday, 18 May 2005
Tuesday, 17 May 2005
Monday, 16 May 2005
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (serviceDescription)
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (xmlAbstractSyntax)
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (wsdlAbstractProtocol)
- Re: Comments on SPARQL (reification)
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (fromUnionQuery)
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals
- Comments on SPARQL
- agenda: RDF Data Access 17 May (in progress)
- agenda: RDF Data Access 17 May
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (wsdlAbstractProtocol)
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (xmlAbstractSyntax)
- Re: protocol draft updated, open issue proposals (fromUnionQuery)
- Re: Comments on SPARQL
- Re: definition of "SPARQL Query", sharing between QL and protocol specs
- regrets for 20051517 telecon
- Re: construct starting to feel like a separate interface
Sunday, 15 May 2005
Saturday, 14 May 2005
- protocol draft updated, open issue proposals
- regrets for Tuesday
- RE: Happy with XQuery/XPath last call specs?
Friday, 13 May 2005
- RE: Happy with XQuery/XPath last call specs?
- Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on XML Schema 1.0 User Experiences
Wednesday, 11 May 2005
Tuesday, 10 May 2005
- Re: definition of "SPARQL Query", sharing between QL and protocol specs
- RE: Happy with XQuery/XPath last call specs?
Monday, 9 May 2005
- Re: definition of "SPARQL Query", sharing between QL and protocol specs
- remaining issues, last call schedule
- sort issue ready to close, right? [was: more sorting test cases]
- Happy with XQuery/XPath last call specs?
- Re: construct starting to feel like a separate interface
- Re: mapping to WSDL (e.g. wsdl:endpoint)?
- Re: construct starting to feel like a separate interface
- mapping to WSDL (e.g. wsdl:endpoint)?
- Re: construct starting to feel like a separate interface
- Re: reminder: no teleconference this week (non-agenda)
- reminder: no teleconference this week (non-agenda)
Sunday, 8 May 2005
Friday, 6 May 2005
- some HTTP traces for SPARQL
- definition of "SPARQL Query", sharing between QL and protocol specs
- construct starting to feel like a separate interface
- Re: toward HTTP traces for SPARQL (fromUnionQuery, CONSTRUCT)
- Re: URI/IRI concrete and abstract syntax
- Re: toward HTTP traces for SPARQL (fromUnionQuery, CONSTRUCT)
Thursday, 5 May 2005
- Re: toward HTTP traces for SPARQL (fromUnionQuery, CONSTRUCT)
- Re: toward HTTP traces for SPARQL (fromUnionQuery, CONSTRUCT)
- minutes: RDF Data Access 3 May for review
Tuesday, 3 May 2005
- toward HTTP traces for SPARQL
- Re: more sorting test cases
- Re: more sorting test cases
- questions on SADDLE
- Apologies
- Re: More definition comments
- Re: More definition comments
- Re: more sorting test cases
- Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format
- Re: more sorting test cases
- Re: more sorting test cases
Monday, 2 May 2005
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 3 May
- protocol draft updated
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 3 May
- agenda: RDF Data Access 3 May
- Re: publish protocol and XML results format
- building tests
- publish protocol and XML results format
- Minutes of DAWG telecon 2005-04-26
- Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Protocol for RDF
Friday, 29 April 2005
Thursday, 28 April 2005
Wednesday, 27 April 2005
Tuesday, 26 April 2005
- Re: saddle
- saddle
- Producing the rq23 grammar
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Apr
- Fine tuning the rq23 grammar
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Apr
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Apr
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Apr
- agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Apr
Monday, 25 April 2005
- turtle and sparql sync - punctuationSyntax
- agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Apr (running late)
- An alternative namespace for XML Schema datatypes
- SPARQL Query Results XML Format
- Variable names and NCNAMES
- more sorting test cases
- Re: Optional WHERE and WHERE {}
Friday, 22 April 2005
Thursday, 21 April 2005
- URI/IRI concrete and abstract syntax
- str and URIs
- [Fwd: : http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAcce​ss/issues#useMentionOp]
- Re: Optional WHERE and WHERE {}
- ASK (was Re: Optional WHERE and WHERE {})
- Optional WHERE and WHERE {}
- RE: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- RE: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- RE: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
Wednesday, 20 April 2005
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Minutes of RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-04-19 for review
Tuesday, 19 April 2005
- RE: Notes on value testing 11.1
- RE: Notes on value testing 11.1
- Re: Notes on value testing 11.1
- Re: need for xs:integer-based compare functions
- need for xs:integer-based compare functions
- RE: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- Re: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- RE: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- RE: XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
- regrets
- Re: Radio station metadata use case
- Re: Radio station metadata use case
- Manfiest property for named grpah loading
- regrets
- Re: ordered results in the results format specs
- Re: Radio station metadata use case
- XQuery value comparisons (Part I - numerics)
Monday, 18 April 2005
- Re: Radio station metadata use case
- agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Apr
- what news from SparqlingDays in Tuscany?
- Re: ordered results in the results format specs
- ordered results in the results format specs
- Re: Minutes of RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-04-12 for review
- Re: Minutes of RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-04-12 for review
Sunday, 17 April 2005
Saturday, 16 April 2005
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- XQuery value comparisons not quite
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- RE: connections to xpath-functions, last call
Friday, 15 April 2005
- Re: using standard functions by URI
- using standard functions by URI
- specifying extended valueTesting without reference to implementations
- connections to xpath-functions, last call
- W3C Workshop on Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services Jun 2005 in Innsbruck
- Re: Next F2F, when and where?
- Next F2F, when and where?
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
Thursday, 14 April 2005
- Re: Minutes of RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-04-12 for review
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- Re: output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- output-xslt good enough for sort objective?
- Re: Why protocol paramters should override the query in the specificiation of the dataset
- Why protocol paramters should override the query in the specificiation of the dataset
- Minutes of RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-04-12 for review
Wednesday, 13 April 2005
- RE: 11th hour datatype testing proposal
- Notes on value testing 11.1
- Re: 11th hour datatype testing proposal
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey (valueTesting)
- Re: fromUnionQuery
- Re: V. odd example
- Re: comments on SPARQL QL, protocol, rf1, tests, requirements from outside the WG
- Re: separator/terminator ;
- Re: V. odd example
- Re: comments on SPARQL QL, protocol, rf1, tests, requirements from outside the WG
- Re: comments on SPARQL QL, protocol, rf1, tests, requirements from outside the WG
- Re: comments on SPARQL QL, protocol, rf1, tests, requirements from outside the WG
- Re: comments on SPARQL QL, protocol, rf1, tests, requirements from outside the WG
Tuesday, 12 April 2005
- comments on SPARQL QL, protocol, rf1, tests, requirements from outside the WG
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey (valueTesting)
- RE: note dissent on requirements/objectives?
- Radio station metadata use case
- regrets
- RE: note dissent on requirements/objectives?
- wsdldg.xsl converts our WSDL 2.0 to WSDL 1.1; hunt for WSDL tools continues
- Re: test case for graphSolutionMapping
- Re: bNodes and properties
- Re: separator/terminator ;
- regrets
- Re: bNodes and properties
- Re: bNodes and properties
- Re: bNodes and properties (was: Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey)
- Re: test case for graphSolutionMapping
- Re: bNodes and properties (was: Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey)
- regrets
- Re: bNodes and properties (was: Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey)
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Re: bNodes and properties (was: Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey)
- bNodes and properties (was: Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey)
Monday, 11 April 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Apr
- agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Apr
- Re: punctuationSyntax
- Re: punctuationSyntax (let's drop reification shorthand)
- Re: OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- Re: separator/terminator ;
- Re: fromUnionQuery
- Re: XHTML Validation issues
Friday, 8 April 2005
- Re: punctuationSyntax (let's drop reification shorthand)
- test case for graphSolutionMapping
- Re: Design Review of SPARQL query 1.293 (valueTesting, DESCRIBE)
- note dissent on requirements/objectives?
- Re: punctuationSyntax (let's drop reification shorthand)
- Re: punctuationSyntax
- Re: punctuationSyntax
- Re: punctuationSyntax
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
Thursday, 7 April 2005
- Re: fromUnionQuery
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- punctuationSyntax
- fromUnionQuery
- Design Review of SPARQL query editor's draft $Revision: 1.293 $ of $Date: 2005/04/05 14:26:19 $
- Review of SPARQL query editor's draft $Revision: 1.293 $ of $Date: 2005/04/05 14:26:19 $
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Introduction: Jeen Broekstra
Wednesday, 6 April 2005
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Re: OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- Re: OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- Re: evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- Re: OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- Re: OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- Re: minutes RDF Data Access 5 Apr for review
- Re: OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- OFFSET/LIMIT, cursors, and DAWG scope boundaries
- evaluating SPARQL w.r.t an RDF query language survey
- separator/terminator ;
Tuesday, 5 April 2005
- Re: More definition comments
- minutes RDF Data Access 5 Apr for review
- Re: Typos and quibbles
- protocol update
- ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting
- possible regrets
- 11th hour datatype testing proposal
- Typos and quibbles
- More definition comments
Monday, 4 April 2005
- V. odd example
- More definition questions/suggestions
- Re: re-open punctuationSyntax to discuss reification short-hand?
- Re: XHTML Validation issues
- Formatting requests
- Re: XHTML Validation issues
- XHTML Validation issues
- Re: valueTesting [was: Editor's Draft ready for DAWG review]
- agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Apr
- valueTesting [was: Editor's Draft ready for DAWG review]