- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:50:27 -0700
- To: "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Ultimately it's just that age-old question: what's better, attributes or > elements? The angels-on-pinheads committee is still out on that > one I think. Oops, that's a bit of a mangled metaphor I think. The usual comparison is elements vs. attribute *names* (in which search efficiency will be very similar). The case we're talking about here is similar but even more indirect, since we're comparing elements to attribute *values*. Howard
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 22:48:54 UTC