- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:12:41 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:04:46 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > I don't mind which style of design - I would go for whatever the XML > community see as most appropriate for processing with XSLT and XQuery. +1 > 2/ Do XML literals go in as XML subtrees? > I assume so - so using the same tags as the wrapper may arise and a > poorly written XPath may (mis)match. Not sure we can remove all > situations of this. Sometimes may actually want it. > Worse case: a query result as XML literal within an XML result set. > Example: querying a detailed server log file of queries and their > results. I would expect XML Literals to be escaped, so they can be handled the same way as other literal types, and to make processing easier in non-XSLT applications. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 20:12:46 UTC