- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:43:06 +0100
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
It might be useful to have what the acronyms stand for. The instructions say: "You have 10 points. Allocate them to your preferred names." But some votes have taken this to be "vote 0-10 per candidate". Is that going to skew the results? Also - I'd like to vote against having any name for the protocol. "protocol" might imply some deep, large complex beast. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <> > Date: 23 September 2004 13:48 > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:26:22AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:18:25AM -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > it doesn't separate the similar QLs from the distinct ones, > > > but that isn't easy. suggestions welcome. > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/2~ > > would you believe this is a hardware problem? > the debounce (and everything else) is screwed up with my shift-ins key. > > > That URI is wrong, of course; this is the correct one: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/ > > tx for the correction > > > But this is a bit flawed: there are at least two recent name ideas > > missing: > > > > DART (for protocol) > > SPARQL (for protocol and QL) > > > > Please add them. > > done > -- > -eric > > office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, > Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, > 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 > JAPAN > +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA > cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) > > (eric@w3.org) > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than > email address distribution.
Received on Monday, 27 September 2004 14:43:38 UTC