- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:45:13 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:33:09PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > > So I suggest: > > Data Access for RDF Query Language - DARQ (pronounced as "dark") > Data Access for RDF Protocol - DARP > > of course, DARP*A* may like the latter :) I'm not sure what's going on, but I keep finding myself in violent agreement with Dave Beckett. I guess that's gotta be a good thing! Anyway, I'm not sure I agree that we need *two* names, but I actually like these two, especially DARQ/"dark". I think it's *great*. It's sorta basic and polyvalent at the same time, like SOAP. So, how does it play in dialogue? "How do I retrieve that RDF representation of the US Senate you were telling me about?", the man asks. "Just use the Python client", the geek answers, "to connect to our server and send a dark query". Nice, Dave. Kendall Clark PS--Maybe if we have a "DARP", then EricM will stop pimping Joseki at conferences and start pimping it! :>
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 13:47:15 UTC