- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:32:01 +0100
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> PS--I find I *really* want triple patterns to be delimited by > parentheses instead of brackets in BRQL. Is that a done deal? Nothing is a done deal - could you explain why though? The parser implications seem to be neutral (although the constraints issue complicates matters) so facts &| opinion are good. If it happens to be because some virtual keyboards don't have all the full range of bracket symbols ... :-) Andy Terminology: http://www.fact-index.com/b/br/bracket.html
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 15:32:45 UTC